On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:57:42AM -0800, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
>> I committed a trivial patch to fix this problem. mv12-aux.C is
>> auxiliary to mv12.C and should have the same test directives as
>> mv12.C.
>>
>> 2013-02-13 Sriraman Talla
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:57:42AM -0800, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
> I committed a trivial patch to fix this problem. mv12-aux.C is
> auxiliary to mv12.C and should have the same test directives as
> mv12.C.
>
> 2013-02-13 Sriraman Tallam
>
> * g++.dg/ext/mv12-aux.C: Add directives to ma
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
>
> On Feb 13, 2013 1:21 AM, "Andreas Schwab" wrote:
>>
>> Sriraman Tallam writes:
>>
>> > Index: gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/mv12-aux.C
>> > ===
>> > --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext
Sriraman Tallam writes:
> Index: gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/mv12-aux.C
> ===
> --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/mv12-aux.C (revision 0)
> +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/mv12-aux.C (revision 0)
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +// Test case t
OK, thanks.
Jason
Hi,
Is this alright to commit?
Thanks
Sri
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On 02/06/2013 08:39 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
>>>
>>> +// Test to check if an error is generated when virtual functions
>>> +// are mult
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 02/06/2013 08:39 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
>>
>> +// Test to check if an error is generated when virtual functions
>> +// are multiversioned.
>
>
> This seems like a TODO, rather than something to test for. I don't see any
> reason why we
On 02/06/2013 08:39 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
+// Test to check if an error is generated when virtual functions
+// are multiversioned.
This seems like a TODO, rather than something to test for. I don't see
any reason why we couldn't support multiversioned virtual functions.
error_at
Hi,
I have attached a patch documenting Function Multiversioning and
added a few more tests. I have also updated the wiki
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FunctionMultiVersioning. Please let me know if
there are any more tests you specifically want.
Please review.
Thanks
Sri
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at
OK. Sriraman, are you working on documentation and more tests?
Jason
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 11:19:04AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 01/18/2013 03:22 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >else if (TREE_CODE (args) != STRING_CST)
> >-gcc_unreachable ();
> >+{
> >+ error ("invalid % attribute value");
> >+ return false;
> >+}
>
> Maybe say that it
On 01/18/2013 03:22 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
else if (TREE_CODE (args) != STRING_CST)
-gcc_unreachable ();
+{
+ error ("invalid % attribute value");
+ return false;
+}
Maybe say that it needs to be a string?
We also need more tests, both for the example in the PR (and
Hi!
As discussed in the PR, this patch attempts to change multiversioning
so that backwards compatibility with the previous target attribute behavior
is preserved. In particular, e.g. for
void foo () __attribute__((target ("avx")));
void foo ()
{
}
the foo definition was just merged with the pre
13 matches
Mail list logo
