On 17 Apr 10:09, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Ilya Tocar wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > There were some discussion about "x" constraints being too conservative
> > for some patterns in i386.md.
> > Patch below fixes it. This is probably stage1 material.
> >
> > ChangeLog:
> >
> >
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Ilya Tocar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There were some discussion about "x" constraints being too conservative
> for some patterns in i386.md.
> Patch below fixes it. This is probably stage1 material.
>
> ChangeLog:
>
> gcc/
>
> 2015-03-19 Ilya Tocar
>
> * config/
Hello,
On 23 Mar 19:02, Ilya Tocar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've renamed EXT_SSE_REG_P into EXT_REX_SSE_REG_P for consistency.
> Ok for stage1?
Patch is OK for stage1.
--
Thanks, K
> On 19 Mar 12:24, Ilya Tocar wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > There were some discussion about "x" constraints being too conservat
Hi,
There were some discussion about "x" constraints being too conservative
for some patterns in i386.md.
Patch below fixes it. This is probably stage1 material.
ChangeLog:
gcc/
2015-03-19 Ilya Tocar
* config/i386/i386.h (EXT_SSE_REG_P): New.
* config/i386/i386.md (*cmpi_mix