> On Nov 16, 2021, at 4:19 PM, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 01:09:15PM -0800, Mike Stump via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> On Nov 15, 2021, at 5:48 PM, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Nitpicking time. It's spelled "ones' complement" rather tha
> Nitpicking time. It's spelled "ones' complement" rather than "one's
> complement". I didn't go into config/.
>
> Ok for trunk?
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * doc/implement-c.texi: Fix spelling.
> * doc/md.texi: Likewise.
> * expmed.c (emit_store_flag_int): Likewise.
> * opt
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 01:09:15PM -0800, Mike Stump via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Nov 15, 2021, at 5:48 PM, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> > Nitpicking time. It's spelled "ones' complement" rather than "one's
> > complement". I didn't go into config/.
> >
> > Ok for trunk?
>
> S
On Nov 15, 2021, at 5:48 PM, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Nitpicking time. It's spelled "ones' complement" rather than "one's
> complement". I didn't go into config/.
>
> Ok for trunk?
So, is it two's complement or twos' complement then? Seems like it should be
the same, but w
On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 15:55:55 +0100
Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches wrote:
> All sources before Knuth are clearly wrong. How could they not?
> Folks living in the pre-Knuth era lived without a deity.
>
> :-P
Not sure if this one's a compliment.
Speaking of which:
$ git grep -i "complim"
gcc/Ch
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 3:40 PM Koning, Paul wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Nov 16, 2021, at 2:03 AM, Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2021, 03:20 Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches <
> > gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 02:01:47AM +, Koning,
> On Nov 16, 2021, at 2:03 AM, Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021, 03:20 Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches <
> gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 02:01:47AM +, Koning, Paul via Gcc-patches
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Nov 15, 2021, at 8:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021, 03:20 Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches <
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 02:01:47AM +, Koning, Paul via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On Nov 15, 2021, at 8:48 PM, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches <
> gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Nit
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 02:01:47AM +, Koning, Paul via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
>
> > On Nov 15, 2021, at 8:48 PM, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> >
> > Nitpicking time. It's spelled "ones' complement" rather than "one's
> > complement".
>
> Is that so? I see Wikipedia claims it
> On Nov 15, 2021, at 8:48 PM, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>
> Nitpicking time. It's spelled "ones' complement" rather than "one's
> complement".
Is that so? I see Wikipedia claims it is, but there are no sources for that
claim. (There is an assertion that it is "discussed at
Nitpicking time. It's spelled "ones' complement" rather than "one's
complement". I didn't go into config/.
Ok for trunk?
gcc/ChangeLog:
* doc/implement-c.texi: Fix spelling.
* doc/md.texi: Likewise.
* expmed.c (emit_store_flag_int): Likewise.
* optabs.c (expand_
11 matches
Mail list logo