On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 15:55:55 +0100 Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> All sources before Knuth are clearly wrong. How could they not? > Folks living in the pre-Knuth era lived without a deity. > > :-P Not sure if this one's a compliment. Speaking of which: $ git grep -i "complim" gcc/ChangeLog-2000: addition over compliments over shifts. gcc/ada/sem_util.adb: -- Assume that the main unit does not have a complimentary unit gcc/ada/sem_util.adb: -- Obtain the complimentary unit of the main unit gcc/config/fr30/fr30.c: /* Convert GCC's comparison operators into the complimentary FR30 gcc/config/mn10300/mn10300.md: /* Recall that twos-compliment is ones-compliment plus one. When gcc/config/nds32/constraints.md: "A constant whose compliment value is in the range of imm15u gcc/config/nds32/nds32.md:;; 'ONE_COMPLIMENT' operation gcc/config/sparc/sparc.h: compliment of ordered and unordered comparisons, but until generic gcc/config/visium/visium.h: compliment of ordered and unordered comparisons, but until generic gcc/d/expr.cc: /* Build a compliment expression, where all the bits in the value are gcc/d/intrinsics.cc: Variants of `bt' will then update that bit. `btc' compliments the bit, `bts' gcc/doc/md.texi:A constant whose compliment value is in the range of imm15u gcc/ipa-reference.c: /* Create the complimentary sets. */ libstdc++-v3/testsuite/data/thirty_years_among_the_dead_preproc.txt:compliment Maybe someone competent should contemplate to complement the fixes for ones' two's complement in the above, except the first and last... ;)
