Re: [PATCH] Fix expand_assignment stores to CONCAT (PR middle-end/83609)

2017-12-30 Thread Richard Biener
On December 30, 2017 8:31:59 PM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >Hi! > >The first hunk before the if (!from...) part shows a typo I've made in >a >recent change, the last argument of simplify_gen_subreg is byte offset, >and >the subreg has same bitsize outer and inner modes, so using byte offset

[PATCH] Fix expand_assignment stores to CONCAT (PR middle-end/83609)

2017-12-30 Thread Jakub Jelinek
Hi! The first hunk before the if (!from...) part shows a typo I've made in a recent change, the last argument of simplify_gen_subreg is byte offset, and the subreg has same bitsize outer and inner modes, so using byte offset 1 makes no sense at all. Another issue that the testcase suffers from is