> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jan Hubicka [mailto:hubi...@ucw.cz]
> > Sent: 21 October 2013 13:21
> > To: Paulo Matos
> > Cc: Richard Biener; Mike Stump; Kyrill Tkachov; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Jan
> > Hubicka (hubi...@ucw.cz)
> > Subject: R
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Hubicka [mailto:hubi...@ucw.cz]
> Sent: 21 October 2013 13:21
> To: Paulo Matos
> Cc: Richard Biener; Mike Stump; Kyrill Tkachov; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Jan
> Hubicka (hubi...@ucw.cz)
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR58682
>
> This
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: 18 October 2013 13:12
> > To: Paulo Matos
> > Cc: Mike Stump; Kyrill Tkachov; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR58682
> >
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 18 October 2013 13:12
> To: Paulo Matos
> Cc: Mike Stump; Kyrill Tkachov; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR58682
>
> Please re-post the latest version o
achov
>> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
>> Subject: RE: [PATCH] Fix PR58682
>>
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Mike Stump [mailto:mikest...@comcast.net]
>> > Sent: 14 October 2013 20:46
>> > To: Kyrill Tkachov
>> > Cc: Paulo Matos; gcc-
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On
> Behalf Of Paulo Matos
> Sent: 16 October 2013 09:42
> To: Mike Stump; Kyrill Tkachov
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] Fix PR58682
>
&
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Stump [mailto:mikest...@comcast.net]
> Sent: 14 October 2013 20:46
> To: Kyrill Tkachov
> Cc: Paulo Matos; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR58682
>
> In this case, I've reviewed the license I suspect you h
October 2013 11:22
>>> To: Kyrill Tkachov
>>> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
>>> Subject: RE: [PATCH] Fix PR58682
>>>
>>>
>>> OK, testcase generated. Patch attached but there are a few issues and need
>>> some comments.
>>>
>&
> -Original Message-
> From: Kyrill Tkachov [mailto:kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com]
> Sent: 14 October 2013 11:44
> To: Paulo Matos
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; mikest...@comcast.net
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR58682
>
> I'd think there would be legal issues add
On 14/10/13 11:23, Paulo Matos wrote:
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On
Behalf Of Paulo Matos
Sent: 14 October 2013 11:22
To: Kyrill Tkachov
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Fix PR58682
OK, testcase
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On
> Behalf Of Paulo Matos
> Sent: 11 October 2013 08:55
> To: Kyrill Tkachov
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] Fix PR58682
>
>
> Thanks, f
> -Original Message-
> From: Kyrill Tkachov [mailto:kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com]
> Sent: 10 October 2013 17:15
> To: Paulo Matos
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR58682
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> On 10/10/13 17:10, Paulo Matos wrote:
>
Hi Paul,
On 10/10/13 17:10, Paulo Matos wrote:
- inline_call (edge, true, &new_indirect_edges, &overall_size, true);
+ if (inline_call (edge, true, &new_indirect_edges, &overall_size,
true))
+{
+ /* Update max_count if new edges were found */
Comments e
This is a patch for trunk. It should be backported to 4_8, once it thaws.
OK for trunk?
2013-10-10 Paulo Matos
PR gcov-profile/58682
* ipa-inline.c (inline_small_functions): Update
max_count if new edges are added after inline_call.
Paulo Matos
pr58682.patch
Desc
14 matches
Mail list logo
