On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 01:36:28PM +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
> We segfaulted on attached testcase, because we were accessing
> ->typed.type field via TREE_TYPE, but IDENTIFIER_NODEs don't contain
> ->typed element at all. Fixed by switching the expressions in
> a condition, so we always first c
We segfaulted on attached testcase, because we were accessing
->typed.type field via TREE_TYPE, but IDENTIFIER_NODEs don't contain
->typed element at all. Fixed by switching the expressions in
a condition, so we always first check that we're operating on
INTEGER_CST.
Regtested/bootstrapped on x86
