On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 01:36:28PM +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
> We segfaulted on attached testcase, because we were accessing
> ->typed.type field via TREE_TYPE, but IDENTIFIER_NODEs don't contain
> ->typed element at all. Fixed by switching the expressions in
> a condition, so we always first check that we're operating on
> INTEGER_CST.
> Regtested/bootstrapped on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk and 4.7 branch?
>
> 2012-12-03 Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com>
>
> PR c/55570
> * c-common.c (check_user_alignment):
Missing descrption of the change above, I'd say
Swap order of tests, check TREE_CODE first.
or similar.
Ok with that change.
Jakub
