OK.
Jason
On Wed, 23 Mar 2016, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 03/22/2016 07:12 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > > On 03/22/2016 05:35 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > + i
On 03/22/2016 07:12 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 03/22/2016 05:35 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
+ if (cp_unevaluated_operand == 0
Why check this here?
Just so that the chan
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On 03/22/2016 05:35 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
>>>
>>> + if (cp_unevaluated_operand == 0
>>
>>
>> Why check this here?
>
> Just so that the change doesn't affect the behavior
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 03/22/2016 05:35 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
>>
>> + if (cp_unevaluated_operand == 0
>
>
> Why check this here?
Just so that the change doesn't affect the behavior of tsubst_decl()
when cp_unevaluated_operand != 0. Presumably th
On 03/22/2016 05:35 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
+ if (cp_unevaluated_operand == 0
Why check this here?
Jason
With c++14 an NSDMI no longer makes a class type non-aggregate so it's
possible to perform aggregate initialization on a class that has an
NSDMI, but tsubst_copy() currently ICEs on a use of 'this' in such
a situation.
This patch makes tsubst_copy() handle a use of 'this' in an NSDMI as
part of an
