On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 03/22/2016 05:35 PM, Patrick Palka wrote: >> >> + if (cp_unevaluated_operand == 0 > > > Why check this here?
Just so that the change doesn't affect the behavior of tsubst_decl() when cp_unevaluated_operand != 0. Presumably the existing code (10 lines below) handles that case just fine.
