> Hi!
>
> When ICF encounteres a GIMPLE_PREDICT (as in the testcase) or GIMPLE_NOP,
> it stops looking at further statements in the bb (assumes they must be the
> same), which is of course wrong.
>
> I'm attaching 3 versions of the patch, the first one I've
> bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linu
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> When ICF encounteres a GIMPLE_PREDICT (as in the testcase) or GIMPLE_NOP,
> it stops looking at further statements in the bb (assumes they must be the
> same), which is of course wrong.
>
> I'm attaching 3 versions of the patch, the first one I
Hi!
When ICF encounteres a GIMPLE_PREDICT (as in the testcase) or GIMPLE_NOP,
it stops looking at further statements in the bb (assumes they must be the
same), which is of course wrong.
I'm attaching 3 versions of the patch, the first one I've
bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux