Am 20.08.2014 um 22:12 schrieb Svante Signell:
> On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 10:48 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> Svante Signell, le Wed 21 May 2014 10:44:54 +0200, a écrit :
>>> On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 10:33 +0200, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
>> I think the majority of work has bee done, Now that patch wi
On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 10:48 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Wed 21 May 2014 10:44:54 +0200, a écrit :
> > On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 10:33 +0200, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> > > > > I think the majority of work has bee done, Now that patch will change
> > > > > slightly for every missing
BTW,
> I wonder ho the kfreebsd people managed to get accepted upstream?
This is typically a good example of patches being accepted too rapidly,
and leading to maintenance issues, see:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56274
for which nobody is stepping up to fix.
So we might well en
Svante Signell, le Wed 21 May 2014 11:42:30 +0200, a écrit :
> On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 11:27 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Guaranteeing long term support *is* about taking up the work of checking
> > periodically that the port works fine. If anybody does it, then it's
> > fine. If nobody does i
On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 11:27 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Wed 21 May 2014 11:22:44 +0200, a écrit :
> > On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 10:47 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Svante Signell, le Wed 21 May 2014 10:40:37 +0200, a écrit :
> > > > > > What kind of person do you have to be
Svante Signell, le Wed 21 May 2014 11:22:44 +0200, a écrit :
> On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 10:47 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, le Wed 21 May 2014 10:40:37 +0200, a écrit :
> > > > > What kind of person do you have to be to be accepted, a GNU/Hurd
> > > > > developer or a GNU/Ada devel
On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 10:47 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Wed 21 May 2014 10:40:37 +0200, a écrit :
> > > > What kind of person do you have to be to be accepted, a GNU/Hurd
> > > > developer or a GNU/Ada developer having a gnu.org account?
> > >
> > > Nothing special, just lik
Svante Signell, le Wed 21 May 2014 10:44:54 +0200, a écrit :
> On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 10:33 +0200, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> > > > I think the majority of work has bee done, Now that patch will change
> > > > slightly for every missing feature added to Hurd.
> > >
> > > Then it's all good, it's a mat
Svante Signell, le Wed 21 May 2014 10:40:37 +0200, a écrit :
> > > What kind of person do you have to be to be accepted, a GNU/Hurd
> > > developer or a GNU/Ada developer having a gnu.org account?
> >
> > Nothing special, just like for contributing to any opensource project;
> > just someone who c
On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 10:33 +0200, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> > > I think the majority of work has bee done, Now that patch will change
> > > slightly for every missing feature added to Hurd.
> >
> > Then it's all good, it's a matter of what I said above.
>
> Don't forget also the part where general
Arnaud Charlet, le Wed 21 May 2014 10:33:31 +0200, a écrit :
> > > I think the majority of work has bee done, Now that patch will change
> > > slightly for every missing feature added to Hurd.
> >
> > Then it's all good, it's a matter of what I said above.
>
> Don't forget also the part where gen
On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 10:29 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Wed 21 May 2014 10:20:16 +0200, a écrit :
> > On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 10:03 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Svante Signell, le Wed 21 May 2014 09:49:59 +0200, a écrit :
> > > > Thomas and Samuel: It looks like upstream
> > I think the majority of work has bee done, Now that patch will change
> > slightly for every missing feature added to Hurd.
>
> Then it's all good, it's a matter of what I said above.
Don't forget also the part where general changes are done in GNAT which
require update to target specific fil
Svante Signell, le Wed 21 May 2014 10:20:16 +0200, a écrit :
> On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 10:03 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, le Wed 21 May 2014 09:49:59 +0200, a écrit :
> > > Thomas and Samuel: It looks like upstream don't accept patches unless a
> > > Hurd port maintainer commits
On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 10:03 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Wed 21 May 2014 09:49:59 +0200, a écrit :
> > Thomas and Samuel: It looks like upstream don't accept patches unless a
> > Hurd port maintainer commits to it. What's the use of all this job?
>
> Well, simply to keep the
Svante Signell, le Wed 21 May 2014 09:49:59 +0200, a écrit :
> Thomas and Samuel: It looks like upstream don't accept patches unless a
> Hurd port maintainer commits to it. What's the use of all this job?
Well, simply to keep the changes working. That is not surprising at all.
> (Of course it ca
On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 16:25 +0200, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> > > That's actually the biggest concern when people submit a new port: they
> > > submit it, get it approved, commit it and then are no longer available
> > > for any maintenance when these files need to be updated/become outdated/
> > > no
> > That's actually the biggest concern when people submit a new port: they
> > submit it, get it approved, commit it and then are no longer available
> > for any maintenance when these files need to be updated/become outdated/
> > no longer compile or run.
>
> I can try to do that in the near fut
On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 15:53 +0200, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> > Do you want me to remove all GNU/Hurd specific header file info?
>
> No, I want you to remove commented out code, such as:
>
> > +-- SIGLTHRRES : constant := 32; -- GNU/LinuxThreads restart signal
> > +-- SIGLTHRCAN : constant := 3
> Do you want me to remove all GNU/Hurd specific header file info?
No, I want you to remove commented out code, such as:
> +-- SIGLTHRRES : constant := 32; -- GNU/LinuxThreads restart signal
> +-- SIGLTHRCAN : constant := 33; -- GNU/LinuxThreads cancel signal
> +-- SIGLTHRDBG : constant :
On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 14:50 +0200, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> > The build went fine. Is something still missing?
>
> We never keep commented out code, except with a ??? comment explaining why.
Do you want me to remove all GNU/Hurd specific header file info?
> We don't use 'FIXME', we use ??? instea
> The build went fine. Is something still missing?
We never keep commented out code, except with a ??? comment explaining why.
We don't use 'FIXME', we use ??? instead.
Also, some of the comments seem to be copy/paste from freebsd, which is
likely not appropriate for GNU Hurd, so need to be revis
On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 12:53 +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > Attached is a patch for support of GNU/Hurd in gnat-4.9. This patch has
> > been used and updated in Debian since gnat-4.6, and is currently used to
> > build gnat-4.9. Now when the body file s-osinte-posix.adb in gcc-4.9
> > defines tv_ns
> Attached is a patch for support of GNU/Hurd in gnat-4.9. This patch has
> been used and updated in Debian since gnat-4.6, and is currently used to
> build gnat-4.9. Now when the body file s-osinte-posix.adb in gcc-4.9
> defines tv_nsec in timespec POSIX-correctly as long again, we think it
> is t
Hello,
Attached is a patch for support of GNU/Hurd in gnat-4.9. This patch has
been used and updated in Debian since gnat-4.6, and is currently used to
build gnat-4.9. Now when the body file s-osinte-posix.adb in gcc-4.9
defines tv_nsec in timespec POSIX-correctly as long again, we think it
is tim
25 matches
Mail list logo
