On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:13 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:44 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
Sorry about that. I am right now trying to reproduce the
profiledbootstrap
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:44 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>>> Sorry about that. I am right now trying to reproduce the
>>> profiledbootstrap problem that H.J. reported, which is on
>>> x86_64-un
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:44 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>> Sorry about that. I am right now trying to reproduce the
>> profiledbootstrap problem that H.J. reported, which is on
>> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu where I had successfully done a
>> profiledbo
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> Sorry about that. I am right now trying to reproduce the
> profiledbootstrap problem that H.J. reported, which is on
> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu where I had successfully done a
> profiledbootstrap before my commit.
>
> Unfortunately after svn
Sorry about that. I am right now trying to reproduce the
profiledbootstrap problem that H.J. reported, which is on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu where I had successfully done a
profiledbootstrap before my commit.
Unfortunately after svn updating my client I am hitting an unrelated
build problem with my
On 2012.09.04 at 14:23 -0700, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> I just committed the patch (included below). I implemented the
> occupancy bit vector approach for recording non-zero histogram
> entries, and a few issues uncovered with the merging in a profiled
> bootstrap.
>
> Passes both bootstrap and prof
I just committed the patch (included below). I implemented the
occupancy bit vector approach for recording non-zero histogram
entries, and a few issues uncovered with the merging in a profiled
bootstrap.
Passes both bootstrap and profiledbootstrap builds and regression tests.
Thanks,
Teresa
Enha
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 6:12 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >> Index: libgcc/libgcov.c
> >> ===
> >> --- libgcc/libgcov.c (revision 190736)
> >> +++ libgcc/libgcov.c (working copy)
> >> @@ -276,6 +276,78 @@ gcov_version (struct gcov_inf
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 6:12 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> Index: libgcc/libgcov.c
>> ===
>> --- libgcc/libgcov.c (revision 190736)
>> +++ libgcc/libgcov.c (working copy)
>> @@ -276,6 +276,78 @@ gcov_version (struct gcov_info *ptr, gcov
> Index: libgcc/libgcov.c
> ===
> --- libgcc/libgcov.c (revision 190736)
> +++ libgcc/libgcov.c (working copy)
> @@ -276,6 +276,78 @@ gcov_version (struct gcov_info *ptr, gcov_unsigned
>return 1;
> }
>
> +/* Insert counter VAL
Revision to earlier patch to augment the gcov program summary with working set
information. We now emit the non-zero arc counter histogram entries into the
summary, instead of computing the working set information and emitting that
into the summary. The working set information is computed by the c
11 matches
Mail list logo