On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 1:25 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On April 4, 2015 5:03:14 AM GMT+02:00, Sebastian Pop wrote:
>>On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 4:09 PM, James Greenhalgh
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 07:53:12PM +0100, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Sebastian
On April 4, 2015 5:03:14 AM GMT+02:00, Sebastian Pop wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 4:09 PM, James Greenhalgh
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 07:53:12PM +0100, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Sebastian Pop
>wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 5:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 4:09 PM, James Greenhalgh
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 07:53:12PM +0100, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 5:51 PM, James Greenhalgh
>> > wrote:
>> >> Trunk is currently in Stag
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 07:53:12PM +0100, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 5:51 PM, James Greenhalgh
> > wrote:
> >> Trunk is currently in Stage 4 development, these patches are fairly
> >> low-risk, but they
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 5:51 PM, James Greenhalgh
> wrote:
>> Trunk is currently in Stage 4 development, these patches are fairly
>> low-risk, but they are certainly not regression fixes. I'll defer
>> to port maintainers and release m
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 5:51 PM, James Greenhalgh
wrote:
> Trunk is currently in Stage 4 development, these patches are fairly
> low-risk, but they are certainly not regression fixes. I'll defer
> to port maintainers and release managers for the final say, but in my
> opinion it would not be a
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 11:19:14PM +0100, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> Hi,
>
> from what I understand, Evandro has addressed the comments from Kyrill.
> Are there other problems to be addressed before the patches can go in?
Trunk is currently in Stage 4 development, these patches are fairly
low-risk, b
Austin, TX
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Kyrill Tkachov [mailto:kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 3:33
>> To: Evandro Menezes; 'GCC Patches'
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] [ARM] Add support for the Samsung E
Evandro Menezes Austin, TX
> -Original Message-
> From: Kyrill Tkachov [mailto:kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 3:33
> To: Evandro Menezes; 'GCC Patches'
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] [ARM] Add support for the Samsung Exynos M1
Hi Evandro
On 30/03/15 22:51, Evandro Menezes wrote:
The Samsung Exynos M1 implements the ARMv8 ISA and this patch adds support
for it through the -mcpu command-line option.
The patch was checked on arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf without new failures.
OK for trunk?
-- Evandro Menezes Austin, TX
The Samsung Exynos M1 implements the ARMv8 ISA and this patch adds support
for it through the -mcpu command-line option.
The patch was checked on arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf without new failures.
OK for trunk?
--
Evandro Menezes Austin, TX
0001-ARM-Add-option-fo
11 matches
Mail list logo
