On 11/12/15 01:26, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 05:05:12PM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 12/10/2015 03:36 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
I'm okay with delaying this for next stage 1 if people prefer, though I
think it's
pretty low risk.
I think this is something we should fix
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 05:05:12PM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 12/10/2015 03:36 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> >I'm okay with delaying this for next stage 1 if people prefer, though I
> >think it's
> >pretty low risk.
>
> I think this is something we should fix now.
I agree.
> >+ x = XEXP
On 12/10/2015 03:36 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
I'm okay with delaying this for next stage 1 if people prefer, though I
think it's
pretty low risk.
I think this is something we should fix now.
+ x = XEXP (x, 0);
+ if (start > 0)
+ x = gen_rtx_LSHIFTRT (mode, x, GEN_INT
Hi all,
At the end of combine if it fails to recognise the patterns it produces it tries
again after transforming all zero_extends and zero_extracts into and-immediate
plus
an LSHIFTRT if needed. However, it will construct an LSHIFTRT inside the AND
even
if the shift distance is 0, which can hu
