On Wednesday 27 April 2011 23:10:14 Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:54:37PM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote:
> > On Wednesday 27 April 2011 01:06:26 Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > It's an 'if -- else if' construct. If gfc_notify_std == FAILURE, then
> > > the error message is issues and the fu
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:54:37PM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 April 2011 01:06:26 Steve Kargl wrote:
> >
> > It's an 'if -- else if' construct. If gfc_notify_std == FAILURE, then
> > the error message is issues and the function returns. If it is TRUE,
> > then there should be
On Wednesday 27 April 2011 01:06:26 Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > Index: primary.c
> > > ===
> > > --- primary.c (revision 172974)
> > > +++ primary.c (working copy)
> > > @@ -541,6 +541,17 @@ match_real_constant (gfc_expr **result,
> >
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:23:03AM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 April 2011 18:52:58 Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:15:35PM +0300, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 22:45, Steve Kargl
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:26:20PM
On Tuesday 26 April 2011 18:52:58 Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:15:35PM +0300, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 22:45, Steve Kargl
> >
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:26:20PM +0300, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> > >> Hmm, I'd prefer if the warning was is
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 19:52, Steve Kargl
wrote:
> Yes. I've implemented in the revised patch, and I've
> updated the docs.
>
> 2011-04-26 Steven G. Kargl
>
> PR fortran/48720
> * gfortran.texi: Document the 'Q' exponent-letter extension.
> * invoke.texi: Document -Wreal-
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:15:35PM +0300, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 22:45, Steve Kargl
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:26:20PM +0300, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> >> Hmm, I'd prefer if the warning was issued only with -Wsomething which
> >> would be included in -Wall. Bu
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 22:45, Steve Kargl
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:26:20PM +0300, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 21:42, Steve Kargl
>> wrote:
>> > Historically, gfortran has accepted real-literal-constants
>> > of the form 1.23Q45 as single precision values. ??Many
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:26:20PM +0300, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 21:42, Steve Kargl
> wrote:
> > Historically, gfortran has accepted real-literal-constants
> > of the form 1.23Q45 as single precision values. ??Many commercial
> > compilers (dating back years) have used th
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 21:42, Steve Kargl
wrote:
> Historically, gfortran has accepted real-literal-constants
> of the form 1.23Q45 as single precision values. Many commercial
> compilers (dating back years) have used the 'Q' exponent-letter
> to mean quadruple precision. With the addition of s
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:42:07AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> 2011-04-25 Steven G. Kargl
>
> PR fortran/48720
> * gfortran.texi: Document the 'Q' exponent-letter extension.
> * primary.c (match_real_constant): Accept 'Q' as exponent-letter
> for REAL(16) real-litera
Historically, gfortran has accepted real-literal-constants
of the form 1.23Q45 as single precision values. Many commercial
compilers (dating back years) have used the 'Q' exponent-letter
to mean quadruple precision. With the addition of software
support for REAL(16) on i386 and x86_64 targets, I
12 matches
Mail list logo
