On Wednesday 27 April 2011 23:10:14 Steve Kargl wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:54:37PM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote: > > On Wednesday 27 April 2011 01:06:26 Steve Kargl wrote: > > > It's an 'if -- else if' construct. If gfc_notify_std == FAILURE, then > > > the error message is issues and the function returns. If it is TRUE, > > > then there should be no messages and else if() is tested. > > > > My concern is that gfc_notify_std seems to return SUCCESS on warnings (I > > can't test right now as make has decided to rebuild the whole middle-end > > :-(). Then, I expect double warnings with -pedantic -Wreal-q-constant as > > -pedantic is a (the only one ?) case outputing warnings for GNU > > extensions. > > > > Mikael > > laptop:kargl[220] gfc4x -pedantic -Wreal-q-constant -o z ui.f90 > ui.f90:3.12: > > q = 1.23q45 > 1 > Warning: Extension: exponent-letter 'q' in real-literal-constant at (1) > laptop:kargl[221] gfc4x -pedantic -o z ui.f90 > ui.f90:3.12: > > q = 1.23q45 > 1 > Warning: Extension: exponent-letter 'q' in real-literal-constant at (1) > laptop:kargl[222] gfc4x -Wreal-q-constant -o z ui.f90 > ui.f90:3.12: > > q = 1.23q45 > 1 > Warning: Extension: exponent-letter 'q' in real-literal-constant at (1) Well, that's something odd that I don't want to investigate further. As it is clean from a user point of view, let's move on.
Mikael
