Re: [PATCH, testsuite] Skip tail call tests on Thumb-1 targets

2016-05-26 Thread Kyrill Tkachov
On 26/05/16 09:24, Thomas Preudhomme wrote: On Wednesday 25 May 2016 11:38:44 Mike Stump wrote: On May 25, 2016, at 10:20 AM, Thomas Preudhomme wrote: 2016-05-24 Thomas Preud'homme * gcc.dg/plugin/plugin.exp: skip tail call tests for Thumb-1. Is this ok for trunk? Ok. Normally

Re: [PATCH, testsuite] Skip tail call tests on Thumb-1 targets

2016-05-26 Thread Thomas Preudhomme
On Wednesday 25 May 2016 11:38:44 Mike Stump wrote: > On May 25, 2016, at 10:20 AM, Thomas Preudhomme wrote: > > 2016-05-24 Thomas Preud'homme > > > >* gcc.dg/plugin/plugin.exp: skip tail call tests for Thumb-1. > > > > Is this ok for trunk? > > Ok. Normally I'd just punt to the ar

Re: [PATCH, testsuite] Skip tail call tests on Thumb-1 targets

2016-05-25 Thread Mike Stump
On May 25, 2016, at 10:20 AM, Thomas Preudhomme wrote: > > 2016-05-24 Thomas Preud'homme > >* gcc.dg/plugin/plugin.exp: skip tail call tests for Thumb-1. > Is this ok for trunk? Ok. Normally I'd just punt to the arm folks. Better to Cc them on the patch. I watch all the changes

[PATCH, testsuite] Skip tail call tests on Thumb-1 targets

2016-05-25 Thread Thomas Preudhomme
Hi, The sibcall_epilogue expand in arm.md is only defined for TARGET_32BIT targets and thus is not defined for TARGET_THUMB1 targets. As a result, tail call plugin tests fail with "cannot tail-call: machine description does not have a sibcall_epilogue instruction pattern". This patch skip these