On Wednesday 25 May 2016 11:38:44 Mike Stump wrote:
> On May 25, 2016, at 10:20 AM, Thomas Preudhomme 
<thomas.preudho...@foss.arm.com> wrote:
> > 2016-05-24  Thomas Preud'homme  <thomas.preudho...@arm.com>
> > 
> >        * gcc.dg/plugin/plugin.exp: skip tail call tests for Thumb-1.
> > 
> > Is this ok for trunk?
> 
> Ok.  Normally I'd just punt to the arm folks. Better to Cc them on the
> patch.  I watch all the changes to the .exp files, and will scream if
> something seems to be going wrong.

Fair enough. I was not sure because it was touching to .exp files. What do ARM 
maintainers think?

Is this ok for trunk?

Best regards,

Thomas
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/plugin/plugin.exp b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/plugin/plugin.exp
index 62f6797..321b4ba 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/plugin/plugin.exp
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/plugin/plugin.exp
@@ -90,6 +90,12 @@ foreach plugin_test $plugin_test_list {
     if ![runtest_file_p $runtests $plugin_src] then {
         continue
     }
+    # Skip tail call tests on targets that do not have sibcall_epilogue.
+    if {[regexp ".*must_tail_call_plugin.c" $plugin_src]
+	&& [istarget arm*-*-*]
+	&& [check_effective_target_arm_thumb1]} then {
+	continue
+    }
     set plugin_input_tests [lreplace $plugin_test 0 0]
     plugin-test-execute $plugin_src $plugin_input_tests
 }

Reply via email to