Hi Carl,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 05:09:00PM -0700, Carl Love wrote:
> I believe I have addressed all of your concerns with the patch.
>
> I have retested it and it looks good.
It looks good indeed. Please commit, thanks!
I noticed one more thing (follow-up patch?)
> /* { dg-final { scan-asse
Segher:
I believe I have addressed all of your concerns with the patch.
I have retested it and it looks good.
Please let me know if the patch looks OK for GCC mainline.
Carl Love
>From 8d354f93c5ddb5161b
Hi Carl,
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 01:52:15PM -0700, Carl Love wrote:
> Per our discussions, the previous patch had issues with the target
> !powerpc*-*-aix* not working correctly and thus the instruction count
> test was not being done. I have addressed those issues and verified by
> inspecting th
Segher:
Per our discussions, the previous patch had issues with the target
!powerpc*-*-aix* not working correctly and thus the instruction count
test was not being done. I have addressed those issues and verified by
inspecting the gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.log file to make sure the test was
actually
Hi!
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 08:12:31AM -0700, Carl Love wrote:
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/altivec-7.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/altivec-7.c
> @@ -85,17 +85,22 @@ int main ()
> /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vpkpx" 2 } } */
> /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-time
GCC Maintainers:
The following patch fixes the instruction count tests for various
builtin testcases that fail on AIX. The expected instruction counts
differ in a few cases between Linux and AIX. An AIX instruction target
was added to the instruction count tests that differ on AIX and Linux.
Add
