Hi!
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 03:14:18PM -0700, Carl Love wrote:
> The following patch adds missing test cases for
> vec_extract_fp32_from_shortl(), vec_extract_fp32_from_shorth(), and
> vec_extract().
This is fine for trunk. Thank you!
Segher
> 2018-06-27 Carl Love
>
> * gcc.targe
GCC Maintainers:
The following patch adds missing test cases for
vec_extract_fp32_from_shortl(), vec_extract_fp32_from_shorth(), and
vec_extract().
The patch has been run on:
powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu (Power 8 LE)
powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu (Power 9 LE)
without regressions.
Pl
On Sun, Jun 03, 2018 at 07:50:36PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> * gcc.target/powerpc/altivec-7.c: Remove extra brace.
Please commit this if you haven't already. Thanks!
Segher
* gcc.target/powerpc/altivec-7.c: Remove extra brace.
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/altivec-7.c
===
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/altivec-7.c(revision 261129)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/altiv
Hi Carl,
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 08:37:01AM -0700, Carl Love wrote:
> * gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-3.c: Add tests
> test_sll_vuill_vuill_vuc,
Stray tab.
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vupklpx" 1 { target le } } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vupklpx" 1 { tar
GCC maintainers:
The patch has been reworked again to take advantage of the le and be
selectors available, the separate BE and LE test files have been
combined into a single test file. The result testing is now qualified
based on the le and be selectors. This reduces the difficulty of
maintainin
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 11:39:37AM -0700, Carl Love wrote:
> > > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-1-be.c
> > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-1-be.c
> > > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> > > -/* { dg-do compile { target { powerpc64-*-* } } } */
> > > +/* { dg-do compile { target {
On Wed, 2018-05-23 at 13:26 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi Carl,
>
> I committed the be/le selectors.
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 08:15:30AM -0700, Carl Love wrote:
> > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-1-be.c
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-1-be.c
> > @@
Hi Carl,
I committed the be/le selectors.
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 08:15:30AM -0700, Carl Love wrote:
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-1-be.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-1-be.c
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -/* { dg-do compile { target { powerpc64-*-* } } } */
> +/* {
GCC maintainers:
I updated the CommitLog for gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/altivec-
12.c to clarify the change.
A new test selector for big endian (be) and little endian (le) is added
to specify the platform for the tests to run on independent of the
platform being 32-bit or 64 bit. The vario
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 02:40:11PM -0700, Carl Love wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-05-17 at 15:31 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 12:53:13PM -0700, Carl Love wrote:
> > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/altivec-12.c
> > > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/altivec-
On Thu, 2018-05-17 at 15:31 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 12:53:13PM -0700, Carl Love wrote:
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/altivec-12.c
> > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/altivec-12.c
> > index b0267b5..1f3175f 100644
> > --- a/gcc/tests
On 5/17/18 3:31 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 12:53:13PM -0700, Carl Love wrote:
>> @@ -27,21 +27,21 @@
>> /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vmulosb" 1 } } */
>>
>> // For LE platforms P9 and later, we generate the lxv insn instead of
>> lxvd2x.
>> -/* { dg-final
Hi!
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 12:53:13PM -0700, Carl Love wrote:
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/altivec-12.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/altivec-12.c
> index b0267b5..1f3175f 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/altivec-12.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powe
GCC maintainers:
The following patch adds various missing builtin test cases. I also
went through the various test files and made sure that each test had a
corresponding instruction count test if appropriate. In some cases, I
had to add count tests. For one of the tests, I had to create a BE an
15 matches
Mail list logo