On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 03:31:30PM +, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 10:54:25PM -0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Yangfei (Felix)
> > wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:27 PM, Yangfei (Felix)
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > Hi,
> > >> >
> > >> >
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 10:54:25PM -0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Yangfei (Felix) wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:27 PM, Yangfei (Felix)
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > As discussed in LKML:
> >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Yangfei (Felix) wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:27 PM, Yangfei (Felix)
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > As discussed in LKML:
>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-July/355996.html,
>> the
>> cost of changing a cache line
>> > from
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:27 PM, Yangfei (Felix) wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > As discussed in LKML:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-July/355996.html,
> the
> cost of changing a cache line
> > from shared to exclusive state can be significant on aarch64 cores,
> esp
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:27 PM, Yangfei (Felix) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As discussed in LKML:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-July/355996.html,
> the cost of changing a cache line
> from shared to exclusive state can be significant on aarch64 cores,
> especially wh
Hi,
As discussed in LKML:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-July/355996.html,
the cost of changing a cache line
from shared to exclusive state can be significant on aarch64 cores,
especially when this is triggered by an exclusive store, since it may
result i
