On 15/03/13 16:37, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
OK for stage-1.
This may be a naive question, but with AArch64 being a new port
and these changes being port-specific, with no impact on anything
else, have you considered asking the release managers to be mo
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
> OK for stage-1.
This may be a naive question, but with AArch64 being a new port
and these changes being port-specific, with no impact on anything
else, have you considered asking the release managers to be more
aggressive in applying things?
Of cour
On 14/03/13 15:52, Ian Bolton wrote:
We couldn't generate SBC for AArch64 ... until now!
This really patch includes the main pattern, a zero_extend form
of it and a test.
Full regression testing for Linux and bare-metal passed.
OK for trunk stage-1?
Thanks,
Ian
2013-03-14 Ian Bolton
gcc
We couldn't generate SBC for AArch64 ... until now!
This really patch includes the main pattern, a zero_extend form
of it and a test.
Full regression testing for Linux and bare-metal passed.
OK for trunk stage-1?
Thanks,
Ian
2013-03-14 Ian Bolton
gcc/
* config/aarch64/aarch64.md (
