On 15/03/13 16:37, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
OK for stage-1.
This may be a naive question, but with AArch64 being a new port
and these changes being port-specific, with no impact on anything
else, have you considered asking the release managers to be more
aggressive in applying things?
Of course, if you, too, are stabilizing the port and it's good
enough to be used as is and those changes are just the topping
on the ice cream, just ignore my note. :-)
Gerald
Yes, it is a new port, but it's important that 4.8.0 works and we can't
afford a mess-up at the last minute causing problems.
I think it would be better to seek leniency for selected back-ports
early in the 4.8.1 cycle.
R.
