On 03/05/2024 15:45, Alex Coplan wrote:
> This fixes a typo in combine_reg_notes in the load/store pair fusion
> pass. As it stands, the calls to filter_notes store any
> REG_FRAME_RELATED_EXPR to fr_expr with the following association:
>
> - i2 -> fr_expr[0]
> - i1 -> fr_expr[1]
>
> but then
This fixes a typo in combine_reg_notes in the load/store pair fusion
pass. As it stands, the calls to filter_notes store any
REG_FRAME_RELATED_EXPR to fr_expr with the following association:
- i2 -> fr_expr[0]
- i1 -> fr_expr[1]
but then the checks inside the following if statement expect the
Christophe Lyon writes:
> Fix the comment to document FEATURE_STRING instead of FEAT_STRING.
>
> 2024-03-29 Christophe Lyon
>
> gcc/
> * config/aarch64/aarch64-option-extensions.def: Fix comment.
OK, thanks.
Richard
> ---
> gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-option-extensions.def | 16 +
Fix the comment to document FEATURE_STRING instead of FEAT_STRING.
2024-03-29 Christophe Lyon
gcc/
* config/aarch64/aarch64-option-extensions.def: Fix comment.
---
gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-option-extensions.def | 16
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deleti
On 01/12/15 09:04, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 08:58:53AM +, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>> The patch to restructure builtin_reciprocals missed out an obvious ')'.
>> Adjusted thusly and applied as obvious to trunk.
>
> Sorry for that. Could you please also handle the gi
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 08:58:53AM +, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> The patch to restructure builtin_reciprocals missed out an obvious ')'.
> Adjusted thusly and applied as obvious to trunk.
Sorry for that. Could you please also handle the gimple_call_internal_p
case, so that it actually ret
The patch to restructure builtin_reciprocals missed out an obvious ')'.
Adjusted thusly and applied as obvious to trunk.
regards
Ramana
2015-12-01 Ramana Radhakrishnan
* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_builtin_reciprocal): Fix typo.
Committed as obvious r226061.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-07-22 Charles Baylis
* config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md (vec_store_lanesoi_lane): Fix
typo in attribute.
From 7d98f7fc82cfc3012b460e4f4f91200fedcb04db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Charles Baylis
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 16:54:32
On 15/08/14 17:24, Evandro Menezes wrote:
> I tripped at a typo that goes undetected because the macro NAMED_PARAM
> doesn't apply in the absence of designated initializers.
>
> Since struct scale_addr_mode_cost has the cost for DI, but not for QI, the
> instances of struct cpu_addrcost_table are
Greenhalgh; Richard Earnshaw; Marcus
Shawcroft; ram...@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, AArch64] Fix typo
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Evandro Menezes wrote:
> This is a trivial patch. However, without it, the addressing mode
> cost is incorrectly calculated, since the cost intended for
: Evandro Menezes [mailto:e.mene...@samsung.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 14:40
> To: 'James Greenhalgh'
> Cc: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'; 'James Greenhalgh';
> 'richard.earns...@arm.com'; 'marcus.shawcr...@arm.com'
> Subject:
ichard.earns...@arm.com'; 'marcus.shawcr...@arm.com'
Subject: RE: [PATCH, AArch64] Fix typo
Ping, pretty please.
--
Evandro Menezes Austin, USA
e.mene...@samsung.com +1-512-425-3365
-Original Message-
From: Evandro Menezes [mailto:e.m
x27;gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'; 'James Greenhalgh';
'richard.earns...@arm.com'; 'marcus.shawcr...@arm.com'
Subject: RE: [PATCH, AArch64] Fix typo
Ping.
--
Evandro Menezes Austin, USA
e.mene...@samsung.com +1-512-425-336
hes@gcc.gnu.org'; 'James Greenhalgh';
'richard.earns...@arm.com'; 'marcus.shawcr...@arm.com'
Subject: RE: [PATCH, AArch64] Fix typo
Thanks for the review.
--
Evandro Menezes Austin, USA
e.mene...@samsung.com +1-512-425-336
, 2014 11:36
To: Evandro Menezes
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; 'James Greenhalgh'; richard.earns...@arm.com;
marcus.shawcr...@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH, AArch64] Fix typo
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 05:24:58PM +0100, Evandro Menezes wrote:
> I tripped at a typo that goes undetected beca
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 05:24:58PM +0100, Evandro Menezes wrote:
> I tripped at a typo that goes undetected because the macro NAMED_PARAM
> doesn't apply in the absence of designated initializers.
>
> Since struct scale_addr_mode_cost has the cost for DI, but not for QI, the
> instances of struct
I tripped at a typo that goes undetected because the macro NAMED_PARAM
doesn't apply in the absence of designated initializers.
Since struct scale_addr_mode_cost has the cost for DI, but not for QI, the
instances of struct cpu_addrcost_table are not initialized as intended due
to the different ord
17 matches
Mail list logo
