Hi Mike,
On 24/06/25 10:03 am, Michael Meissner wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 01:19:45PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 10:38:30PM +0530, Surya Kumari Jangala wrote:
>>> On 14/06/25 2:13 pm, Michael Meissner wrote:
This is patch #4 of 4 to add -mcpu=f
On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 01:19:45PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 10:38:30PM +0530, Surya Kumari Jangala wrote:
> > On 14/06/25 2:13 pm, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > > This is patch #4 of 4 to add -mcpu=future support to the PowerPC.
> >
> > I think this should
Hi!
On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 10:38:30PM +0530, Surya Kumari Jangala wrote:
> On 14/06/25 2:13 pm, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > This is patch #4 of 4 to add -mcpu=future support to the PowerPC.
>
> I think this should be a separate patch in itself. As such, this
> patch is not required to enable the
Hi Mike,
On 14/06/25 2:13 pm, Michael Meissner wrote:
> This is patch #4 of 4 to add -mcpu=future support to the PowerPC.
I think this should be a separate patch in itself. As such, this
patch is not required to enable the -mcpu=future option.
>
> In the development for the power10 processor, G
This is patch #4 of 4 to add -mcpu=future support to the PowerPC.
In the development for the power10 processor, GCC did not enable using the load
vector pair and store vector pair instructions when optimizing things like
memory copy. This patch enables using those instructions if -mcpu=future is