On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 07:30:51PM +0530, Surya Kumari Jangala wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On 14/06/25 2:07 pm, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > This is patch #1 of 4 that adds the support that can be used in developing
> > GCC
> > support for future PowerPC processors.
>
> Please reword the commit message
On 24/06/25 10:21 am, Michael Meissner wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 07:30:51PM +0530, Surya Kumari Jangala wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> On 14/06/25 2:07 pm, Michael Meissner wrote:
>>> This is patch #1 of 4 that adds the support that can be used in developing
>>> GCC
>>> support for future Powe
On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 07:30:51PM +0530, Surya Kumari Jangala wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On 14/06/25 2:07 pm, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > This is patch #1 of 4 that adds the support that can be used in developing
> > GCC
> > support for future PowerPC processors.
>
> Please reword the commit message
Hi!
On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 07:30:51PM +0530, Surya Kumari Jangala wrote:
> On 14/06/25 2:07 pm, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > @@ -119,6 +122,7 @@
> > | OPTION_MASK_FLOAT128_HW \
> > | OPTION_MASK_FLOAT128_KEYWORD \
> >
Hi Mike,
On 14/06/25 2:07 pm, Michael Meissner wrote:
> This is patch #1 of 4 that adds the support that can be used in developing GCC
> support for future PowerPC processors.
Please reword the commit message, perhaps something like:
This is patch #1 of 4 that adds support for the option -mcpu=fu
This is patch #1 of 4 that adds the support that can be used in developing GCC
support for future PowerPC processors.
I have tested these patches on both big endian and little endian PowerPC
servers, with no regressions. Can I check these patchs into the trunk?
2025-06-13 Michael Meissner
