On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> Thanks for the review.
>>
>> On 04/08/16 17:26, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 6:12 AM, kugan
>> >wrote:
>> >>Hi,
>> >>
>> >>During IPA-VRP implementation, I realized that we don't support streaming
>> >>w
> Hi Richard,
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> On 04/08/16 17:26, Richard Biener wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 6:12 AM, kugan
> >wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>During IPA-VRP implementation, I realized that we don't support streaming
> >>wide_int in LTO. Attached patch does this. Tested with IPA-VRP.
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 10:09 AM, kugan
wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> On 04/08/16 17:26, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 6:12 AM, kugan
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> During IPA-VRP implementation, I realized that we don't support streaming
>>> wide_int in L
Hi Richard,
Thanks for the review.
On 04/08/16 17:26, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 6:12 AM, kugan wrote:
Hi,
During IPA-VRP implementation, I realized that we don't support streaming
wide_int in LTO. Attached patch does this. Tested with IPA-VRP. Is this OK
for trunk if boots
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 6:12 AM, kugan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> During IPA-VRP implementation, I realized that we don't support streaming
> wide_int in LTO. Attached patch does this. Tested with IPA-VRP. Is this OK
> for trunk if bootstrap and regression testing is fine.
Hmm, those functions belong to dat
Hi,
During IPA-VRP implementation, I realized that we don't support
streaming wide_int in LTO. Attached patch does this. Tested with
IPA-VRP. Is this OK for trunk if bootstrap and regression testing is fine.
Thanks,
Kugan
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-08-04 Kugan Vivekanandarajah
* lto-st
