On Fri, Apr 13, 2018, 7:53 PM Paolo Carlini
wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> On 14/04/2018 00:12, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 13/04/2018 19:45, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >> Ah, I see. The problem is that even though convert_to_integer_1 was
> >> called with dofold false, we lose that when it call
Hi again,
On 14/04/2018 00:12, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 13/04/2018 19:45, Jason Merrill wrote:
Ah, I see. The problem is that even though convert_to_integer_1 was
called with dofold false, we lose that when it calls convert(). Why
not recurse directly to convert_to_integer_1 with the under
Hi,
On 13/04/2018 19:45, Jason Merrill wrote:
Ah, I see. The problem is that even though convert_to_integer_1 was
called with dofold false, we lose that when it calls convert(). Why
not recurse directly to convert_to_integer_1 with the underlying type?
That would avoid the undesired folding.
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 1:18 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 13/04/2018 19:14, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 1:05 PM, Paolo Carlini
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 13/04/2018 16:06, Jason Merrill wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 5:05 AM, Paolo Carlini
>
Hi,
On 13/04/2018 19:14, Jason Merrill wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 1:05 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 13/04/2018 16:06, Jason Merrill wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 5:05 AM, Paolo Carlini
wrote:
Hi,
in this error-recovery regression, after a sensible error message issued
by
cxx_const
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 1:05 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 13/04/2018 16:06, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 5:05 AM, Paolo Carlini
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> in this error-recovery regression, after a sensible error message issued
>>> by
>>> cxx_constant_init, store
Hi,
On 13/04/2018 16:06, Jason Merrill wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 5:05 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
in this error-recovery regression, after a sensible error message issued by
cxx_constant_init, store_init_value stores an error_mark_node as
DECL_INITIAL of the VAR_DECL for 'j'. This error
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 5:05 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in this error-recovery regression, after a sensible error message issued by
> cxx_constant_init, store_init_value stores an error_mark_node as
> DECL_INITIAL of the VAR_DECL for 'j'. This error_mark_node reappears much
> later, to cau
Hi,
in this error-recovery regression, after a sensible error message issued
by cxx_constant_init, store_init_value stores an error_mark_node as
DECL_INITIAL of the VAR_DECL for 'j'. This error_mark_node reappears
much later, to cause a crash during gimplification. As far as I know,
the choic
