Re: [C++ Patch] PR 29003

2011-06-09 Thread Jason Merrill
OK. Jason

Re: [C++ Patch] PR 29003

2011-06-09 Thread Paolo Carlini
On 06/09/2011 04:06 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: On 06/09/2011 06:07 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote: I tested on x86_64-linux the below patchlet for a long standing accepts-invalid. Is it ok for mainline? Or do we want a different error message? A somehow tighter check? The error message needs to say som

Re: [C++ Patch] PR 29003

2011-06-09 Thread Jason Merrill
On 06/09/2011 06:07 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote: I tested on x86_64-linux the below patchlet for a long standing accepts-invalid. Is it ok for mainline? Or do we want a different error message? A somehow tighter check? The error message needs to say something about typedef being the problem. Mayb

[C++ Patch] PR 29003

2011-06-09 Thread Paolo Carlini
Hi, I tested on x86_64-linux the below patchlet for a long standing accepts-invalid. Is it ok for mainline? Or do we want a different error message? A somehow tighter check? Thanks, Paolo. // /cp 2011-06-09 Paolo Carlini PR c++/29003 * decl.c (grokdeclarat