On 06/09/2011 06:07 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
I tested on x86_64-linux the below patchlet for a long standing accepts-invalid. Is it ok for mainline? Or do we want a different error message? A somehow tighter check?
The error message needs to say something about typedef being the problem. Maybe follow the pattern of the previous error, and say
error ("declaration of %qD as %<typedef%>", dname);
Jason
