On 29 October 2013 10:38, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> On 10/24/13 00:04, Kugan wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> arm testcases neon-vcond-ltgt.c and neon-vcond-unordered.c fails in
>> Linaro 4.8 branch. It is not reproducable with trunk but it can happen.
>> Both neon-vcond-ltgt.c and neon-vcond-unordered.
On 10/24/13 00:04, Kugan wrote:
Hi,
arm testcases neon-vcond-ltgt.c and neon-vcond-unordered.c fails in
Linaro 4.8 branch. It is not reproducable with trunk but it can happen.
Both neon-vcond-ltgt.c and neon-vcond-unordered.c scans for vbsl
instruction, with other vector instructions. However, a
On 10/24/13 00:04, Kugan wrote:
Hi,
arm testcases neon-vcond-ltgt.c and neon-vcond-unordered.c fails in
Linaro 4.8 branch. It is not reproducable with trunk but it can happen.
Both neon-vcond-ltgt.c and neon-vcond-unordered.c scans for vbsl
instruction, with other vector instructions. However, a
On 25/10/13 19:04, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> On 24/10/13 20:03, Kugan wrote:
>>
>> Hi Kyrill,
>>
>> It happens for armv5te arm-none-linux-gnueabi. --with-mode=arm
>> --with-arch=armv5te --with-float=soft
>
> Ah ok, I can reproduce it now. So, while I agree that we add a scan for
> vbit and vbif to t
On 24/10/13 20:03, Kugan wrote:
Hi Kyrill,
It happens for armv5te arm-none-linux-gnueabi. --with-mode=arm
--with-arch=armv5te --with-float=soft
Ah ok, I can reproduce it now. So, while I agree that we add a scan for vbit and
vbif to these testcases, there seems to be something dodgy going on
> I can't seem to get it to fail on my checkout of the linaro 4.8 branch.
> I tried both arm-none-eabi and arm-none-linux-gnueabihf. What kind of
> options/configuration are needed to reproduce this? Also, what kind of
> assembly is produced when the testcase fails? It'd be nice to make sure
> tha
On 24/10/13 15:52, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Hi Kyrill,
Kugan only fixes the tests we have observed to fail.
The different allocation is not caused by LRA, since we haven't
backported it to our 4.8-based branch.
The different allocation is caused by another difference between 4.8 and trunk.
I can't
Hi Kyrill,
Kugan only fixes the tests we have observed to fail.
The different allocation is not caused by LRA, since we haven't
backported it to our 4.8-based branch.
The different allocation is caused by another difference between 4.8 and trunk.
Christophe.
On 24 October 2013 16:39, Kyrill Tka
On 24/10/13 00:04, Kugan wrote:
Hi,
arm testcases neon-vcond-ltgt.c and neon-vcond-unordered.c fails in
Linaro 4.8 branch. It is not reproducable with trunk but it can happen.
Both neon-vcond-ltgt.c and neon-vcond-unordered.c scans for vbsl
instruction, with other vector instructions. However, a
Hi,
arm testcases neon-vcond-ltgt.c and neon-vcond-unordered.c fails in
Linaro 4.8 branch. It is not reproducable with trunk but it can happen.
Both neon-vcond-ltgt.c and neon-vcond-unordered.c scans for vbsl
instruction, with other vector instructions. However, as per the comment
for "neon_vbsl_
10 matches
Mail list logo
