On 29 October 2013 10:38, Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramra...@arm.com> wrote: > On 10/24/13 00:04, Kugan wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> arm testcases neon-vcond-ltgt.c and neon-vcond-unordered.c fails in >> Linaro 4.8 branch. It is not reproducable with trunk but it can happen. >> Both neon-vcond-ltgt.c and neon-vcond-unordered.c scans for vbsl >> instruction, with other vector instructions. However, as per the comment >> for "neon_vbsl<mode>_internal" md pattern defined in neon.md, gcc can >> generate vbsl or vbit or vbif depending on the register allocation. >> Therfore, these testcases should scan for one of these three >> instructions instead of just vbsl. I have updated the testcases to scan >> vbsl or vbit or vbif now. >> >> Is this OK? >> >> Thanks, >> Kugan > > > > Hit send too soon on my earlier email. Minor nit in the Changelog as below. > Need a newline between the DATE line and the file names . > > Committed on Kugan's behalf as rev 204336.
Christophe.
