> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Sandiford [mailto:richard.sandif...@arm.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 6:38 PM
> To: duanbo (C)
> Cc: GCC Patches
> Subject: Re: [PATCH PR96757] aarch64: ICE during GIMPLE pass: vect
>
> Thanks for the updat
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Sandiford [mailto:richard.sandif...@arm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2020 7:56 PM
> To: duanbo (C)
> Cc: GCC Patches
> Subject: Re: [PATCH PR96757] aarch64: ICE during GIMPLE pass: vect
>
> Hi,
>
> "dua
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Sandiford [mailto:richard.sandif...@arm.com]
> Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2020 2:31 AM
> To: duanbo (C)
> Cc: GCC Patches ; rguent...@suse.de
> Subject: Re: [PATCH PR96757] aarch64: ICE during GIMPLE pass: vect
>
&
Hi,
This is a fix for PR96757.
Before vect pass, the main statements of the test case will be optimized like：
_1 = d_10(D) > 3;
_2 = a_11(D) > m_12(D);
_18 = _1 > _2 ? _26 : 0;
At the beginning of vectorization analysis, function
vect_recog_mask_conversion_pattern
proce
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Pinski [mailto:pins...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 11:49 AM
> To: duanbo (C)
> Cc: GCC Patches
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] aarch64: Change the definition of Pmode [pr95182]
>
> On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 8:23 PM duanb
Hi,
This changes the definition of Pmode for aarch64 port.
Unlike x86, S390 etc., Pmode is always set to DImode for aarch64 port even
under ILP32.
Because of that definition, machine mode of symbol_ref which is supposed to be
SImode becomes DImode under target ILP32.
Definition of Pmode should
patch.
Any suggestions.
Thanks,
Duanbo
> -Original Message-
> From: Christophe Lyon [mailto:christophe.l...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 2:41 PM
> To: duanbo (C) ; GCC Patches patc...@gcc.gnu.org>; Richard Sandiford
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] aarch64：Add an
Hi
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Sandiford [mailto:richard.sandif...@arm.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2020 10:42 PM
> To: duanbo (C)
> Cc: GCC Patches
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] aarch64：Add an error message in large code model for
> ilp32 [PR94577]
>
Hi
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Sandiford [mailto:richard.sandif...@arm.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 9:38 PM
> To: duanbo (C)
> Cc: Wilco Dijkstra ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH PR94577] [AArch64] ：Add an error message in large
>
: Wilco Dijkstra [mailto:wilco.dijks...@arm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2020 4:40 AM
To: GCC Patches ; duanbo (C)
Subject: Re: [PATCH PR2] aarch64：Add an error message in large code model
for ilp32
Hi Duanbo,
> This is a simple fix for pr94577.
> The option -mabi=ilp32 should not be u
Hi
This is a simple fix for pr94577.
The option -mabi=ilp32 should not be used in large code model. Like x86, using
-mx32 and -mcmodel=large together will result in an error message.
On aarch64, there is no error message for this option conflict.
A solution to this problem can be found in the att
pass after applying the patch.
Attached please find the my new patch. Can you sponsor it if it's OK to go?
Thanks,
Duan bo
-邮件原件-
发件人: Richard Sandiford [mailto:richard.sandif...@arm.com]
发送时间: 2020年3月17日 18:30
收件人: duanbo (C)
抄送: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
主题: Re: [PATCH PR94201] aarc
Hi
The testcase pr78255.c triggers ice when testing GCC trunk on aarch64 with
-mabi=ilp32 -fPIC.
Case path: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr78255.c
The ICE is caused by insufficient support for the tiny code model under ilp32
mode with fPIC option, where a SI mode register might be used for
13 matches
Mail list logo
