Le 2020-07-25 13:54, Thomas Koenig a écrit :
Am 24.07.20 um 23:19 schrieb dhumieres.domini...@free.fr:
Le 2020-07-24 20:50, Thomas Koenig a écrit :
Hi Dominique,
I have committed the patch after regression-testing.
Thanks.
Dou you want to backport this, as well?
IMO it is worth the work
Le 2020-07-24 20:50, Thomas Koenig a écrit :
Hi Dominique,
I have committed the patch after regression-testing.
Thanks.
Dou you want to backport this, as well?
IMO it is worth the work.
(And if one of my e-mails bounced, you can try the other one.
What is the other one?
Dominique
I am not set up to commit on git, someone will have to do it for me.
TIA
Dominique
--- ../_clean/libgfortran/io/write_float.def 2020-06-13 03:11:55.0 +0200
+++ libgfortran/io/write_float.def 2020-07-21 23:03:08.0 +0200
@@ -987,16 +987,19 @@ determine_en_precision (st_parameter_dt
The fix is obvious (I have added a comment). The tests are probably an
overkill, but it does not hurt.
I am not set up to commit on git, someone will have to do it for me.
TIA
Dominique
--- ../_clean/libgfortran/io/write_float.def 2020-06-13 03:11:55.0 +0200
+++ libgfortran/io/write_fl
Le 2020-06-30 23:39, Thomas Koenig a écrit :
OK,
so here is an updated version, which includes the updated test cases.
Anything else? OK for trunk?
Nothing to report!-)
Thanks for the patch,
Dominique
Le 2020-06-27 13:34, Thomas Koenig a écrit :
Hi Dominieque,
While investigating pr95538, I see several module files that were not
cleaned.
Several were cleaned by a patch I had in my working directory.
However new ones were not cleaned (e.g., gfortran.dg/pr95091.f90) due
to continuation lin
