Hi Rasmus,
The VxWorks part is ok. The plugin part looks good to me
as well, now in line with Richard's comment, but is not for
me to approve.
Thanks, and Thanks Richard for the original review.
Cheers,
Olivier
> On 2 Dec 2021, at 08:22, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>
> The transposition nolto ->
The transposition nolto -> notlo is confusing and it makes the long
name even harder to read than it already is - I kept reading it as
"not lo" until I realized it was a simple typo.
Fixes: 5269b24605b1 (Silence warning in LTO mode on VxWorks)
lto-plugin/
* lto-plugin.c: Fix -linker-outpu
On 12/1/21 10:16, Marek Polacek wrote:
In C++23, auto(x) is valid, so decltype(auto(x)) should also be valid,
so
void f(decltype(auto(0)));
should be just as
void f(int);
but currently, everytime we see 'auto' in a parameter-declaration-clause,
we try to synthesize_implicit_template_par
On 12/1/21 10:16, Marek Polacek wrote:
Here we crash when issuing the "constraint C has type T, not bool"
error, because pp_cxx_parameter_mapping wasn't prepared to see an
anonymous template parameter. With this patch we print
error: constraint 'auto() [with = 0]' has type '',
not 'bool'
The
On 12/1/21 10:16, Marek Polacek wrote:
In r11-4758, I tried to fix this problem:
int &&i = 0;
decltype(auto) j = i; // should behave like int &&j = i; error
wherein do_auto_deduction was getting confused with a REFERENCE_REF_P
and it didn't realize its operand was a name, not an expressio
On 12/1/21 12:22, Marek Polacek wrote:
Here we issue a bogus:
error: '(0 ? fake_tuple_size_v : fake_tuple_size_v)' is not a
constant expression
because cxx_constant_value in expand_integer_pack gets
*(0 ? VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(fake_tuple_size_v) : VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(fake_tuple_size_v))
which is a
Hi Haochen,
on 2021/12/1 下午5:01, HAO CHEN GUI via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hi,
> This patch modifies the combine pattern with a helper -
> change_pseudo_and_mask when recog fails.
> The helper converts a single pseudo to the pseudo AND with a mask if the
> outer operator is IOR/XOR/PLUS
> and the
This is now used by -fharden-conditional-branches and
-fharden-compares to detach the values used in redundant hardening
compares from their original locations. It eventually still expands
to an asm statement, as before, but the temporary is only introduced
at expand time, preventing gimple opti
On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 6:07 AM Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
> Introduce vec_set_0 pattern for V8HI and V8HF modes to implement scalar
> element 0 inserts to from a GP register, SSE register or memory. Also
> add V8HI and V8HF AVX2 (x,x,x) alternative to PINSR insn pattern, which is
> split after reload t
Hi,
This patch fixes a typo that occurred during the splitting of the
std.math module into a package.
Bootstrapped and regression tested on aarch64-linux-gnu, and committed
to mainline.
Regards,
Iain.
---
libphobos/ChangeLog:
* src/std/math/hardware.d (FloatingPointControl.getControlSt
Hi,
This patch disables the D runtime garbage collector after initializing.
Not all targets that support building libdruntime have a stable garbage
collector, so to avoid running into problems where live memory allocated
by the D GC is freed, disable all in-flight collections until a time
when sc
Hi,
This patch prefixes D object files from the root package with 'root-'.
None of the front-end module names in either the dmd or root package
collide just yet, but that does not mean they won't in the future.
Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu, and committed to
mainline.
R
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 12:17:47PM -0500, Patrick Palka wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 10:26 AM Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> > Here we ICE on
> >
> > int f() requires (auto(0));
> >
> > in do_auto_deduction when handling the auto: we're in a non-templated
> > requires-expression
Hi,
As I studied, the issue with this bug is similar as PR102285:
For the testing case:
int
qy (void)
{
int tw = 4;
int fb[tw];
return fb[2]; /* { dg-warning "uninitialized" } */
}
if compiled with
/home/opc/Install/cross/bin/riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -c -O1
-mno-strict-align -ft
Juliet 1.3's CWE415_Double_Free__malloc_free_*_67a.c
were showing leak false positives in non-LTO builds; fixed thusly.
Successfully bootstrapped & regrtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Pushed to trunk as r12-5701-g860c56b5bc356960a4d0445dadc43ceddbe3c7e2.
gcc/analyzer/ChangeLog:
PR analyzer
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 10:36:52AM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> Hi! This is the last patch broken out of the previous test suite patch
> for the new builtins support.
Whew :-)
> One advantage of the new builtins support is uniform error messages for
> arguments with restricted values. Previousl
Hi!
On 12/1/21 4:29 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 10:15:21AM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:
>> Hi! This patch is broken out from the test case patch for the new
>> builtins support.
>>
>> One advantage of the new builtins support is uniform error messages for
>> arguments wi
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 10:18:06AM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> Hi! This patch is broken out from the test suite patch for the new
> builtins support. This one is just a minor adjustment for the error
> message wording.
>
> Tested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu and powerpc64-linux-gnu (-m32/-m64)
> wi
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 10:15:21AM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> Hi! This patch is broken out from the test case patch for the new
> builtins support.
>
> One advantage of the new builtins support is uniform error messages for
> arguments with restricted values. Previously this was done in many p
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 07:47:38AM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> Hi! This patch is broken out from the patch with test suite changes for the
> new builtins support.
>
> With the old builtins support, cmpb-2.c produces:
> warning: implicit declaration of function '__builtin_cmpb; did you mean
>
Introduce vec_set_0 pattern for V8HI and V8HF modes to implement scalar
element 0 inserts to from a GP register, SSE register or memory. Also
add V8HI and V8HF AVX2 (x,x,x) alternative to PINSR insn pattern, which is
split after reload to a sequence of PBROADCASTW and PBLENDW.
The V8HF inserts fr
Hi!
On 12/1/21 3:08 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 12:56:52PM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:
>> Hi! I previously posted [1] to correct some problems with the new builtins
>> support targeting 32-bit code gen. Based on the discussion, I've made some
>> adjustments and would l
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 02:58:54PM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> Hi! This patch is broken out of the previous patch for all the builtins test
> suite adjustments. Here we have some slight changes in error messages due to
> how the internals have changed between the old and new builtins methods.
>
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 03:59:41PM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> On 11/18/21 3:32 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 03:30:48PM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> >> On 11/18/21 3:16 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 05:06:05PM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:
>
Pushed.
---
htdocs/git.html | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/htdocs/git.html b/htdocs/git.html
index de8f0584..493b5734 100644
--- a/htdocs/git.html
+++ b/htdocs/git.html
@@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ in Git.
gccgo
This branch is for the Go front end to gcc. For mo
On the way tweak language a bit.
Pushed.
---
htdocs/gcc-12/changes.html | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-12/changes.html b/htdocs/gcc-12/changes.html
index 45a8d99a..000501fb 100644
--- a/htdocs/gcc-12/changes.html
+++ b/htdocs/gcc-12/changes.html
@@
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 12:56:52PM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> Hi! I previously posted [1] to correct some problems with the new builtins
> support targeting 32-bit code gen. Based on the discussion, I've made some
> adjustments and would like to submit this for consideration.
>
> We eventually
Hi Richard,
Many thanks for the review. Here's the final version that I've committed,
including
your suggested improvements, following another make bootstrap and make -k check
on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with no new failures. Thanks again.
2021-12-01 Roger Sayle
Richard Biener
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 5:19 PM Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 4:30 PM Joseph Myers
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 21 Sep 2021, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 02:15:59PM +0100, Roger Sayle wrote:
>> > > Can you double check? Integer division by zero
On 12/1/21 1:07 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On December 1, 2021 6:42:21 PM GMT+01:00, Peter Bergner
> wrote:
>> On 12/1/21 3:01 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> Given all this I suggest to exempt OPAQUE_TYPE from is_var_need_auto_init
>>> instead of fixing up things at expansion time.
>>
>> The foll
On December 1, 2021 6:42:21 PM GMT+01:00, Peter Bergner
wrote:
>On 12/1/21 3:01 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> Given all this I suggest to exempt OPAQUE_TYPE from is_var_need_auto_init
>> instead of fixing up things at expansion time.
>
>The following fixes the ICE. The bootstrap/regtesting is sti
On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 at 18:16, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Jonathan Wakely via Libstdc:
>
> > diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/cow_string.h
> > b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/cow_string.h
> > index ced395b80b8..4fae1d02981 100644
> > --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/cow_string.h
> > +++ b/libstdc+
On 12/1/21 09:48, Martin Liška wrote:
On 12/1/21 15:34, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 3:25 PM Martin Liška wrote:
On 12/1/21 15:19, Richard Biener wrote:
which is compute the range of 'lhs' on edge_true into
predicate->true_range,
assign that same range to ->false_range and t
* Jonathan Wakely via Libstdc:
> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/cow_string.h
> b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/cow_string.h
> index ced395b80b8..4fae1d02981 100644
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/cow_string.h
> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/cow_string.h
> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGI
On 12/1/21 11:21 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 09:29:42AM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:
>> Recently Kewen fixed a problem in the old builtins support where
>> rs6000_builtin_decl prematurely indicated that a target builtin is
>> unavailable. This also needs to be don
On 12/1/21 3:01 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> Given all this I suggest to exempt OPAQUE_TYPE from is_var_need_auto_init
> instead of fixing up things at expansion time.
The following fixes the ICE. The bootstrap/regtesting is still running though.
Peter
diff --git a/gcc/gimplify.c b/gcc/gimplify
On Tue, Nov 30 2021, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 3:24 PM Martin Jambor wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> in PR 103267 Honza found out that IPA-SRA does not look at
>> ECF_LOOPING_CONST_OR_PURE when evaluating if a call can have side
>> effects. Fixed with this patch. The testcase infini
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 10:54 AM Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2021, Eric Gallager wrote:
> > This next patch does more than just removing old stuff: it adds an
> > extra sentence to describe a shell command used to generate a list, so
> > to verify that I've got the shell c
Here we issue a bogus:
error: '(0 ? fake_tuple_size_v : fake_tuple_size_v)' is not a
constant expression
because cxx_constant_value in expand_integer_pack gets
*(0 ? VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(fake_tuple_size_v) : VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(fake_tuple_size_v))
which is a REFERENCE_REF_P and we evaluate its oper
Hi!
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 09:29:42AM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> Recently Kewen fixed a problem in the old builtins support where
> rs6000_builtin_decl prematurely indicated that a target builtin is
> unavailable. This also needs to be done for the new builtins support, but in
> this case we h
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 10:26 AM Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Here we ICE on
>
> int f() requires (auto(0));
>
> in do_auto_deduction when handling the auto: we're in a non-templated
> requires-expression which are parsed under processing_template_decl == 1
> and empty current_templat
On 12/1/2021 9:18 AM, Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches wrote:
I'm going to hold off pushing this until I hear from the global
maintainers and/or release managers.
This patch fixes a pathological performance case, but it may also be
handled by Andrew's fixes in this area. It's up to y'all to de
Hi! I'd like to ping this patch.
Thanks!
Bill
On 11/18/21 10:36 AM, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> Hi! This is the last patch broken out of the previous test suite patch
> for the new builtins support.
>
> One advantage of the new builtins support is uniform error messages for
> arguments with restricte
Hi! I'd like to ping this patch.
Thanks!
Bill
On 11/18/21 10:18 AM, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> Hi! This patch is broken out from the test suite patch for the new
> builtins support. This one is just a minor adjustment for the error
> message wording.
>
> Tested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu and powerpc6
Hi! I'd like to ping this patch.
Thanks!
Bill
On 11/18/21 10:15 AM, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> Hi! This patch is broken out from the test case patch for the new
> builtins support.
>
> One advantage of the new builtins support is uniform error messages for
> arguments with restricted values. Previo
Patch ping - lightly sorted by priority, simplicity and dependency:
* [PATCH, v5, OpenMP 5.0] Improve OpenMP target support for C++ [PR92120 v5]
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/584602.html
* [PATCH, v2, OpenMP 5.0] Remove array section base-pointer mapping semantics,
a
Hi! I'd like to ping this patch.
Thanks!
Bill
On 11/18/21 7:47 AM, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> Hi! This patch is broken out from the patch with test suite changes for the
> new builtins support.
>
> With the old builtins support, cmpb-2.c produces:
> warning: implicit declaration of function '__bui
Hi! I'd like to ping this patch. Segher had objected to the change in
diagnostics,
but I hope we've solved that now with the better informational message [1].
Thanks!
Bill
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/585250.html
On 11/17/21 2:58 PM, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> Hi! T
Hi!
I'd like to ping this patch. By the way, the diagnostics are improved [1]
since I
sent it, so that we now inform the user that the overloaded function is
implemented
by the instantiated function.
Thanks!
Bill
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/585250.html
On 11/1
I'm going to hold off pushing this until I hear from the global
maintainers and/or release managers.
This patch fixes a pathological performance case, but it may also be
handled by Andrew's fixes in this area. It's up to y'all to decide if
it's something we want in this release. An alternative w
No one has said anything in 48 hours. By the power vested in me, I
declare it approved.
Pushed.
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 5:21 PM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>
> We're using a temporary range cache while computing ranges for PHIs to
> make sure the real cache doesn't get set until all PHIs are computed
On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 04:23:43PM +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> 2021-11-04 Chung-Lin Tang
> Thomas Schwinge
>
> PR fortran/90030
>
> gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
>
> * trans-openmp.c (gfc_omp_finish_clause): Remove fold_convert to pointer
> to char_type_node, add gcc_
On 12/1/21 9:06 AM, Qing Zhao wrote:
>> On Dec 1, 2021, at 3:01 AM, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>> Given all this I suggest to exempt OPAQUE_TYPE from is_var_need_auto_init
>> instead of fixing up things at expansion time.
>
> Agreed.
>
> So, Peter, will you update the routine “is_var_need_auto_i
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 2:36 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 4:48 PM Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> > We are currently restricting loop crossing paths in the generic copier
> > used by the back threader, but we should be able to handle them after
> > loop_done h
Hi Eric,
On Wed, 24 Nov 2021, Eric Gallager wrote:
> This next patch does more than just removing old stuff: it adds an
> extra sentence to describe a shell command used to generate a list, so
> to verify that I've got the shell command right, I'm asking for a
> review.
-There are several other f
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 06:12:50PM +, Hafiz Abid Qadeer wrote:
> * dwarf2cfi.c (dw_stack_pointer_regnum): Change type to struct cfa_reg.
> (dw_frame_pointer_regnum): Likewise.
> (new_cfi_row): Use set_by_dwreg.
> (get_cfa_from_loc_descr): Use set_by_dwreg. Support regis
Hi!
Recently Kewen fixed a problem in the old builtins support where
rs6000_builtin_decl prematurely indicated that a target builtin is
unavailable. This also needs to be done for the new builtins support, but in
this case we have to ensure the error message is still produced from the
overload su
In r11-4758, I tried to fix this problem:
int &&i = 0;
decltype(auto) j = i; // should behave like int &&j = i; error
wherein do_auto_deduction was getting confused with a REFERENCE_REF_P
and it didn't realize its operand was a name, not an expression, and
deduced the wrong type.
Unfortunate
Here we crash when issuing the "constraint C has type T, not bool"
error, because pp_cxx_parameter_mapping wasn't prepared to see an
anonymous template parameter. With this patch we print
error: constraint 'auto() [with = 0]' has type '',
not 'bool'
The "" is what this patch adds.
Bootstrappe
Here we ICE on
int f() requires (auto(0));
in do_auto_deduction when handling the auto: we're in a non-templated
requires-expression which are parsed under processing_template_decl == 1
and empty current_template_parms, so 'current_template_args ()' will
crash. This code is invalid as per "C++
In C++23, auto(x) is valid, so decltype(auto(x)) should also be valid,
so
void f(decltype(auto(0)));
should be just as
void f(int);
but currently, everytime we see 'auto' in a parameter-declaration-clause,
we try to synthesize_implicit_template_parm for it, creating a new template
parameter
Hi!
I'd like to ping following patches:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/583289.html
c++, dyninit: Optimize C++ dynamic initialization by constants into
DECL_INITIAL adjustment [PR102876]
While Jason has added -fimplicit-constexpr which can fix up some cases,
it sti
Hi, I'd like to ping this patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/585294.html
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 2:11 AM Eric Gallager wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 6:27 PM Eric Gallager wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 8:14 AM Eric Gallager wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov
Tested x86_64-linux, pushed to trunk.
If the allocator-extended move constructor move-constructs each element
into the new container, the contents of the old container are left in
moved-from states. We cannot know if those states preserve the
container's ordering and uniqueness guarantees, so jus
Tested x86_64-linux, pushed to trunk.
This adds std::__is_constant_evaluated() as a C++11 wrapper for
__builtin_is_constant_evaluated, but just returning false if the
built-in isn't supported by the compiler. This allows us to use it
throughout the library without checking __has_builtin every tim
Tested x86_64-linux, pushed to trunk.
Most ref-count updates in the COW string are done via the functions in
, which will use non-atomic ops when the program is
known to be single-threaded. The _M_is_leaked() and _M_is_shared()
functions use __atomic_load_n directly, because
doesn't provide a lo
Tested x86_64-linux, pushed to trunk.
When using COW strings, accessing _M_pathname[0] and similar non-const
accessors can cause the string to "leak", meaning it reallocates itself
if it shares ownership with another string object.
This causes test failures for --enable-fully-dynamic-string buil
> On Dec 1, 2021, at 3:01 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 11:35 PM Peter Bergner wrote:
>>
>> On 11/30/21 2:44 PM, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>> Sorry for the confusing…
>>> My major question is:
>>>
>>> for a variable of type __vector_pair, could it be in a reg
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 10:36 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> The target attribute handling is very expensive and for the common case
> from x86intrin.h where many functions get implicitly the same target
> attribute, we can speed up compilation a lot by caching it.
>
> The following patches b
On 12/1/21 15:34, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 3:25 PM Martin Liška wrote:
On 12/1/21 15:19, Richard Biener wrote:
which is compute the range of 'lhs' on edge_true into predicate->true_range,
assign that same range to ->false_range and then invert it to get the
range on the fa
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 3:25 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 12/1/21 15:19, Richard Biener wrote:
> > which is compute the range of 'lhs' on edge_true into predicate->true_range,
> > assign that same range to ->false_range and then invert it to get the
> > range on the false_edge. What I am saying i
Transform tree-object-size to operate on tree objects instead of host
wide integers. This makes it easier to extend to dynamic expressions
for object sizes.
The compute_builtin_object_size interface also now returns a tree
expression instead of HOST_WIDE_INT, so callers have been adjusted to
acco
Handle non-constant expressions in GIMPLE_CALL arguments. Also handle
alloca.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* tree-object-size.c (alloc_object_size): Make and return
non-constant size expression.
(call_object_size): Return expression or unknown based on
whether dynamic object si
Allow returning dynamic expressions from ADDR_EXPR for
__builtin_dynamic_object_size and also allow offsets to be dynamic.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* tree-object-size.c (size_valid_p): New function.
(size_for_offset): Remove OFFSET constness assertion.
(addr_object_size): Build dyna
Handle GIMPLE_PHI and conditionals specially for dynamic objects,
returning PHI/conditional expressions instead of just a MIN/MAX
estimate.
This makes the returned object size variable for loops and conditionals,
so tests need to be adjusted to look for precise size in some cases.
builtin-dynamic-
Recognize the __builtin_dynamic_object_size builtin and add paths in the
object size path to deal with it, but treat it like
__builtin_object_size for now. Also add tests to provide the same
testing coverage for the new builtin name.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* builtins.def (BUILT_IN_DYNAMIC_OBJECT
This patchset implements the __builtin_dynamic_object_size builtin for
gcc. The primary motivation to have this builtin in gcc is to enable
_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 support with gcc, thus allowing greater fortification
in use cases where the potential performance tradeoff is acceptable.
Semantics:
-
Handle hints provided by __attribute__ ((access (...))) to compute
dynamic sizes for objects.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* tree-object-size.c: Include tree-dfa.h.
(parm_object_size): New function.
(collect_object_sizes_for): Call it.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/builtin
On 12/1/21 15:19, Richard Biener wrote:
which is compute the range of 'lhs' on edge_true into predicate->true_range,
assign that same range to ->false_range and then invert it to get the
range on the false_edge. What I am saying is that for better precision
you should do
ranger->range_on_
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 3:18 PM Rasmus Villemoes
wrote:
>
> On 01/12/2021 14.17, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 12:08 PM Rasmus Villemoes
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> The transposition nolto -> notlo is confusing and it makes the long
> >> name even harder to read than it already is - I
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 3:10 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 11/30/21 12:17, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 1:45 PM Martin Liška wrote:
> >>
> >> On 11/26/21 09:12, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 3:32 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 11/24/21 15:14, Ma
On 01/12/2021 14.17, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 12:08 PM Rasmus Villemoes
> wrote:
>>
>> The transposition nolto -> notlo is confusing and it makes the long
>> name even harder to read than it already is - I kept reading it as
>> "not lo" until I realized it was a simply typo.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 6:04 PM Iain Buclaw via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Ping.
>
> Are the common gcc parts OK (also for backporting)?
Yes, OK for backporting as well after a short burn in period.
Richard,
> Iain.
>
> Excerpts from Iain Buclaw's message of November 26, 2021 1:51 pm:
> > Excerpts
On 11/30/21 12:17, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 1:45 PM Martin Liška wrote:
On 11/26/21 09:12, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 3:32 PM Martin Liška wrote:
On 11/24/21 15:14, Martin Liška wrote:
It likely miscompiles gcc.dg/loop-unswitch-5.c, working on that.
Committed as obvious.
Thanks,
Alex
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/macro-def.h (PTR): Fix typo in
comment.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/macro-def.h
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/macro-def.h
index 72a47067631..e681de607
Hi!
On 2021-10-29T17:37:44-0400, Eric Gallager via Gcc-patches
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 2:38 PM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>> On 10/9/2021 7:32 AM, Iain Buclaw via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> > The implementation of the D front-end in GCC is based on the original
>> > C++ version of th
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 4:48 PM Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> We are currently restricting loop crossing paths in the generic copier
> used by the back threader, but we should be able to handle them after
> loop_done has completed.
But this isn't a cost thing but a correctness (as in,
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 2:25 PM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Richard Biener via Gcc-patches writes:
> > On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 11:56 AM Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> When checking for compatible stmts, vect_build_slp_tree_1 did:
> >>
> >>&& !(STMT_VINFO_GR
Richard Biener via Gcc-patches writes:
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 11:56 AM Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>>
>> When checking for compatible stmts, vect_build_slp_tree_1 did:
>>
>>&& !(STMT_VINFO_GROUPED_ACCESS (stmt_info)
>> && (first_stmt_code == AR
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 12:08 PM Rasmus Villemoes
wrote:
>
> The transposition nolto -> notlo is confusing and it makes the long
> name even harder to read than it already is - I kept reading it as
> "not lo" until I realized it was a simply typo.
>
> Fixes: 5269b24605b1 (Silence warning in LTO mo
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 11:56 AM Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> When checking for compatible stmts, vect_build_slp_tree_1 did:
>
>&& !(STMT_VINFO_GROUPED_ACCESS (stmt_info)
> && (first_stmt_code == ARRAY_REF
> || first_stmt_c
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 09:09:41PM -0500, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote:
> For PR61825, honza changed tree_single_nonzero_warnv_p to prevent a later
> declaration from marking a function as weak after we've determined that it
> wasn't weak before. But we shouldn't do that for speculative fol
The transposition nolto -> notlo is confusing and it makes the long
name even harder to read than it already is - I kept reading it as
"not lo" until I realized it was a simply typo.
Fixes: 5269b24605b1 (Silence warning in LTO mode on VxWorks)
lto-plugin/
* lto-plugin.c: Fix -linker-outpu
Hi,
This patch adds documentation for the following new D options:
- New switch that controls what code is generated on a contract
failure (throw or abort).
- New switch that controls mangling of D types in `extern(C++)`
code, as well as setting the compile-time value of
When checking for compatible stmts, vect_build_slp_tree_1 did:
&& !(STMT_VINFO_GROUPED_ACCESS (stmt_info)
&& (first_stmt_code == ARRAY_REF
|| first_stmt_code == BIT_FIELD_REF
|| first_stmt_code == INDIRECT_REF
On 30/11/2021 19:38, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Alex Coplan via Gcc-patches:
>
> > Bootstrapped and regtested on aarch64-linux-gnu, x86_64-linux-gnu, and
> > arm-linux-gnueabihf: no regressions.
> >
> > I'd appreciate any feedback. Is it OK for trunk?
>
> Does this need an ABI warning?
That's a g
This fixes a couple of issues pertaining to (ordinary) fixed-point types
declared with a Small aspect whose value is not equal to the default one.
The processing of this aspect is delayed until the freeze point of the type,
which means that the Small_Value of the entity for the type does not have
Whitespace cleanup only.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
gcc/ada/
* libgnat/a-cbdlli.ads (List): Remove extra space in Aggregate
aspect.diff --git a/gcc/ada/libgnat/a-cbdlli.ads b/gcc/ada/libgnat/a-cbdlli.ads
--- a/gcc/ada/libgnat/a-cbdlli.ads
+++ b/gcc/ada/libg
As a language extension, the declaration of a generic formal function is
allowed to have a default given by an expression in parentheses, where
the expression is of the function's result type and can refer to formal
parameters of the function (in direct analogy with expression functions).
For exam
This makes sure that the Early Call Region Processor in Sem_Elab does not
return a region starting with a construct that is not suitable for being
included into it, for example a freeze node.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
gcc/ada/
* sem_elab.adb (Previous_Suitable_Con
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo