On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 10:26 AM Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Here we ICE on
>
> int f() requires (auto(0));
>
> in do_auto_deduction when handling the auto: we're in a non-templated
> requires-expression which are parsed under processing_template_decl == 1
> and empty current_template_parms, so 'current_template_args ()' will
> crash. This code is invalid as per "C++20 CA378: Remove non-templated
> constrained functions", but of course we shouldn't crash.
FWIW it looks like we can trip over the same bug with valid code:
static_assert(requires { auto(0); });
>
> Since in the scenario above it's expected that current_template_parms is
> null, I've just added a check, and let grokfndecl issue an error.
> I guess another approch would be to fake up a template parameter list
> before calling do_auto_deduction.
>
> For good measure, I've added several well-formed cases with auto(x) in
> a requires-expression.
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
>
> PR c++/103408
>
> gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
>
> * pt.c (do_auto_deduction): Check current_template_parms before
> current_template_args ().
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * g++.dg/cpp23/auto-fncast9.C: New test.
> ---
> gcc/cp/pt.c | 2 +-
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/auto-fncast9.C | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/auto-fncast9.C
>
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.c b/gcc/cp/pt.c
> index f4b9d9673fb..012ca5d06c0 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/pt.c
> +++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c
> @@ -30041,7 +30041,7 @@ do_auto_deduction (tree type, tree init, tree
> auto_node,
> (but we still may have used them for constraint checking above). */;
> else if (context == adc_unify)
> targs = add_to_template_args (outer_targs, targs);
> - else if (processing_template_decl)
> + else if (processing_template_decl && current_template_parms)
> targs = add_to_template_args (current_template_args (), targs);
> return tsubst (type, targs, complain, NULL_TREE);
Won't this mean the call to tsubst here will end up lowering the level
of the auto from 2 to 1 rather than replacing it with the actual
deduced type?
It also looks like this approach doesn't handle static_assert(requires
{ auto(auto(0)); }), probably due to this substitution issue. I guess
we could add a dummy level to 'targs' to work around this..
> }
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/auto-fncast9.C
> b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/auto-fncast9.C
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..45a0ff9b460
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/auto-fncast9.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> +// PR c++/103408
> +// { dg-do compile { target c++23 } }
> +
> +int bad1() requires (auto(true)); // { dg-error "constraints on a
> non-templated function" }
> +
> +template<bool B>
> +int f1() requires (auto(B));
> +
> +template<typename T>
> +struct S { T t; constexpr operator bool() { return true; } };
> +
> +int bad2() requires (bool(S{1})); // { dg-error "constraints on a
> non-templated function" }
> +int bad3() requires (bool(S(1))); // { dg-error "constraints on a
> non-templated function" }
> +
> +template<int N>
> +int f2() requires (bool(S{N}));
> +
> +template<int N>
> +int f3() requires (bool(S(N)));
> +
> +void
> +g ()
> +{
> + f1<true>();
> + f2<42>();
> + f3<42>();
> +}
>
> base-commit: 6b8ecbc6d6652d061d7c72c64352d51eca2df6ca
> --
> 2.33.1
>
