On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 01:24:20PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Since ira_implicitly_set_insn_hard_regs may be called outside of
> ira-lives.c, it can't use the local variable, preferred_alternatives.
> This patch adds an alternative_mask argument to
> ira_implicitly_set_insn_hard_regs.
>
> OK for mast
Hi,
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Preud'homme
> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 3:04 PM
>
> > From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> > ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Preud'homme
> >
> > ChangeLog entry
1) While working on 66260, it struck me as odd that finish_id_expression
had its own code for determining whether an id-expression is dependent,
rather than using type_dependent_expression_p. So this patch tears out
a bunch of code and replaces it with a call; t_d_e_p already handled
everythin
On Aug 5, 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
> It was just a hunch when you talked about BLKmode and params in memory.
> As coalescing is about SSA name (thus register) coalescing I was thinking
> that if you coalesce a register with incoming memory you'll end up with
> more memory accesses?
Since we
Thank you, sir. :-)
Regards,
Abe
On 8/3/15 10:53 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
I was starting to look at Abe's changes to the gimple if-converter and realized
a handful
of the changes were just fixing comments. No reason those shouldn't go in
immediately.
So I pulled them out and applied those
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 03:59:18PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> Makes it quite unparsable to editors of course ...
> >
> > The idea of having .S files that aren't reasonably editable seems kind
> > of silly, but I guess its up to the gas people.
>
> Heh, indeed. Maybe instead do
>
> .insert
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 10:53:29PM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote:
> Le 05/08/2015 21:24, Steve Kargl a écrit :
> > On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 08:54:21PM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote:
> >>
> >> +/* LOCK/UNLOCK statements */
> >> +struct
> >> +{
> >> + gfc_expr *acquired_lock;
> >> +}
> >
On 30/07/15 21:57 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
It seems that this patch results in unresolved symbols.
I am quite sure that the code is right but build system should be adapted.
I noticed that *_cow.cc files are built with -fimplicit-templates. I try
to apply the same with the old abi but I st
On 04/08/15 20:09 +0300, Nikolai Bozhenov wrote:
Hi,
the attached patch removes redundant -save-temps options from some libstdc++
tests, since the option is not needed in dg-do-compile/scan-assembler tests.
Thanks, committed.
Le 05/08/2015 21:24, Steve Kargl a écrit :
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 08:54:21PM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote:
+/* LOCK/UNLOCK statements */
+struct
+{
+ gfc_expr *acquired_lock;
+}
+lock;
Just curious. Why add a struct with a single member?
I would have thought s/expr4/a
- Forwarded message from "H.J. Lu" -
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 13:24:20 -0700
From: "H.J. Lu"
To: g...@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Eric Botcazou , Steven Bosscher
, Richard Sandiford
Subject: [PATCH] PR rtl-optimization/67029: gcc-5.2.0 unable to find a register
to spill with O3 fsched-
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 11:34:28AM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 11:28 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 13:47 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Trevor Saunders
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:06:58AM +020
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 08:54:21PM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote:
>
> this renames the expr4 field of gfc_code to the more descriptive
> ext.lock.acquired_lock.
> Regression tested on x86_64-unkown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?
>
I don't have a problem with a name change.
> +/* LOCK/UNLOCK stateme
Hello,
this renames the expr4 field of gfc_code to the more descriptive
ext.lock.acquired_lock.
Regression tested on x86_64-unkown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?
Mikael
2015-08-05 Mikael Morin
* gfortran.h (struct gfc_code): Move expr4 field to
ext.lock.acquired_lock.
*
On 08/05/2015 10:02 AM, Jiong Wang wrote:
On 28/07/15 16:44, Martin Sebor wrote:
Attached is an updated patch with the changes above.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2015-07-28 Martin Sebor
* g++.dg/Wframe-address-in-Wall.C: New test.
* g++.dg/Wframe-address.C: New test.
* g++.dg/W
The fundamental problem here was that I was setting the type of a
variable TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR to unknown_type_node, which is not dependent,
so places such as finish_id_expression that check dependent_type_p to
determine whether an expression is type-dependent were getting the wrong
answer.
Fixi
We were missing a convert_from_reference.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk and 5.
commit f1f2cd02b7e4549657cf6eeab1d7eae0466ac7a8
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Wed Aug 5 11:46:48 2015 -0400
PR c++/65195
PR c++/66619
* semantics.c (finish_id_expression): Call convert_
Jeff Law writes:
> On 08/05/2015 08:18 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> Building some targets results in a warning about orig_dup[i] potentially
>> being used uninitialised. I think the warning is fair, since it isn't
>> obvious that the reog_data-based loop bound remains unchanged between:
>>
>>
> OK to apply ?
Ok. Thanks!
> gcc/ChangeLog
> 2015-08-05 Nick Clifton
>
> * config/rl78/rl78.c (rl78_rtx_costs): Treat MULT insns as cheap
> if optimizing for size.
>
> Index: gcc/config/rl78/rl78.c
> ===
> RCS f
On 08/05/2015 08:18 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Building some targets results in a warning about orig_dup[i] potentially
being used uninitialised. I think the warning is fair, since it isn't
obvious that the reog_data-based loop bound remains unchanged between:
for (i = 0; i < recog_data.n_
Hi Kyrill,
On 30/07/15 17:08, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi Renlin,
On 30/07/15 16:50, Renlin Li wrote:
Hi all,
This insn should match the following similar rtx pattern and remove the
redundant zero_extend operation if the width of zero_extract and
inner-size of zero_extend totally match.
(set (z
On 08/05/2015 10:07 AM, Alan Lawrence wrote:
Richard Biener wrote:
Furthermore it doesn't work for three such ops which would require
an additional pattern like
(simplfiy
(bit_and:c (op @0 (min @1 @2)) (op @0 @3))
(op @0 (min (min @1 @2) @3
if that's profitable?
Shouldn't that be j
Richard Biener wrote:
Furthermore it doesn't work for three such ops which would require
an additional pattern like
(simplfiy
(bit_and:c (op @0 (min @1 @2)) (op @0 @3))
(op @0 (min (min @1 @2) @3
if that's profitable?
Shouldn't that be just a case of binding @1 in the original patte
On 28/07/15 16:44, Martin Sebor wrote:
Attached is an updated patch with the changes above.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2015-07-28 Martin Sebor
* g++.dg/Wframe-address-in-Wall.C: New test.
* g++.dg/Wframe-address.C: New test.
* g++.dg/Wno-frame-address.C: New test.
* gcc.dg/Wfr
At the moment insn_data contains entries for define_splits and
define_peephole2s "only for reasons of consistency and to simplify
genrecog". We don't need that any more and it just adds bloat.
This patch instead uses separate counters for define_split and
define_peephole2.
It also removes a redun
Hi!
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 15:10:40 +0100, David Sherwood
wrote:
> In lto_input_mode_table there is the following line of code: [...]
Thanks! That's not exactly it, but you put me on the right track.
Testing a patch.
Grüße,
Thomas
pgpvL8b1BSU6F.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Add a new function to return the C condition that must hold for an
.md rtx to be valid. This is needed by the next patch but is a minor
clean-up anyway.
Bootstrapped and regression-tested on x86_64-linux-gnu.
Thanks,
Richard
gcc/
* gensupport.h (get_c_test): Declare.
* gensuppor
This patch adds a gensupport routine that generators can use to get
the number of unique INSN_CODEs, rather than having to track it
themselves. This is needed for a later patch that changes the
way in which INSN_CODE is calculated.
Bootstrapped and regression-tested on x86_64-linux-gnu.
Thanks,
On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 11:28 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 13:47 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Trevor Saunders
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > >> On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 4:37 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 13:47 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Trevor Saunders
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 4:37 AM, wrote:
> >> > From: Trevor Saunders
> >> >
> >> > * config/arc/
On 08/03/2015 07:38 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 07/16/2015 05:03 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>>> So a general question. We're passing in STRICT to several routines, which
>>> is fine. But then we're also checking M_TAIL_MERGE_MODE. What's the
>>> difference between the two? Can they be unified?
>>
>
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 10:40:44 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 16:08:27 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> >> We had established the use of a boolean flag have_offload in gcc::context
> >> to indicate whether during comp
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 12:32:15PM +0100, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 09:40:28AM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> >
> > On 21/07/15 18:14, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 04:21:15PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> These are the te
On 05/08/15 15:27, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Kyrill Tkachov writes:
On 05/08/15 10:03, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Kyrill Tkachov writes:
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/target_attr_1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/target_attr_1.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..72d0838
---
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 02:56:08PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> For reference see below (testing on aarch64 appreciated).
Looks good to me on aarch64-none-elf.
Thanks,
James
> Bootstrap & regtest running on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
>
> Richard.
>
> 2015-08-05 Richard Biener
>
> *
Richard Biener writes:
> For reference see below (testing on aarch64 appreciated).
>
> Bootstrap & regtest running on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
>
> Richard.
>
> 2015-08-05 Richard Biener
>
> * gimple-fold.c (gimple_fold_stmt_to_constant_1): Simplify
> bool comparison canonicalizati
Kyrill Tkachov writes:
> On 05/08/15 10:03, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Kyrill Tkachov writes:
>>
>>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/target_attr_1.c
>>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/target_attr_1.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000..72d0838
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b
Building some targets results in a warning about orig_dup[i] potentially
being used uninitialised. I think the warning is fair, since it isn't
obvious that the reog_data-based loop bound remains unchanged between:
for (i = 0; i < recog_data.n_dups; i++)
orig_dup[i] = *recog_data.dup_loc[i];
Richard Henderson writes:
> On 07/28/2015 01:36 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> > Index: gcc/target-insns.def
> > ===
> > --- gcc/target-insns.def2015-07-28 20:56:29.721512028 +0100
> > +++ gcc/target-insns.def2015-07-28 20:56:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> wi::from_mpz reads the absolute value of the mpz and then negates the
> result if the mpz is negative. When the top bit of the most-significant
> HOST_WIDE_INT in the absolute value is set, we implicitly sign-
> rather than zero-extend it
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 01:47:30PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Trevor Saunders
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 4:37 AM, wro
wi::from_mpz reads the absolute value of the mpz and then negates the
result if the mpz is negative. When the top bit of the most-significant
HOST_WIDE_INT in the absolute value is set, we implicitly sign-
rather than zero-extend it to full precision. For example,
1 << 63 gets mangled to (1 << pr
Hi Thomas,
In lto_input_mode_table there is the following line of code:
machine_mode inner = (machine_mode) table[bp_unpack_value (&bp, 8)];
Is this right? In lto_write_mode_table this inner mode is written out explicitly
into the stream already, so do we just need this instead?
machine_mode in
Hi DJ,
This is OK, but note that it prevents some operations like:
__far int i;
foo()
{
i ++;
}
from being implemented with a minimum set of opcodes. This might be
particularly troublesome for volatile far things.
Right - it is something I will have to look into.
Cheers
Nick
; > > > >>
> > > > > >> > * gimple-fold.c (gimple_fold_stmt_to_constant_1):
> > > > > >> > Canonicalize
> > > > > >> > bool compares on RHS.
> > > > > >> > * match.pd: Add
Hi DJ,
The patch below fixes a small problem with the RL78 backend. When
optimizing for size it is better to use a slow multiply instruction
than a faster, but larger, shift sequence. So the patch tweaks the
rtx costs for MULT insns when speed is not a priority.
Tested with no regress
imple_fold_stmt_to_constant_1): Canonicalize
> > > > >> > bool compares on RHS.
> > > > >> > * match.pd: Add X ==/!= !X is false/true pattern.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> ERROR in VTST/VTSTQ
> > > > >> (/opt/
[ + Andrew Wilkins ]
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 1:58 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> PASS
> kill: not enough arguments
> FAIL: net
> Makefile:4696: recipe for target 'net/check' failed
> make[4]: *** [net/check] Error 1
>
> $ cat net/check-testlog
> PASS
> kill: not enough arguments
> FAIL: net
> ../../.
ld_stmt_to_constant_1): Canonicalize
> > > > >> > bool compares on RHS.
> > > > >> > * match.pd: Add X ==/!= !X is false/true pattern.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> ERROR in VTST/VTSTQ
> > > > >> (/opt/gcc/gcc-20150805/g
> Le 5 août 2015 à 15:11, FX a écrit :
>
>> AFAICT there is something missing in the patch: I do not see any compilation
>> of math/logbq.c and indeed no trace of logbq in libquadmath. What I am
>> missing?
>
> Maybe you didn’t regenerate the Makefile.in?
Indeed I did not!-(I have never succ
hwab wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Richard Biener writes:
> > > >>
> > > >> > * gimple-fold.c (gimple_fold_stmt_to_constant_1): Canonicalize
> > > >> > bool compares on RHS.
> > > >> > * match.pd: A
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 01:47:30PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Trevor Saunders
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 4:37 AM, wrote:
> >> > From: Trevor Saunders
> >> >
> >> > * conf
rites:
> > >>
> > >> > * gimple-fold.c (gimple_fold_stmt_to_constant_1): Canonicalize
> > >> > bool compares on RHS.
> > >> > * match.pd: Add X ==/!= !X is false/true pattern.
> > >>
> > >> ERROR in VTS
This cleans up the acceses to ops arrays in gimple accessors that already
take a code-specific class as argument. There is no need to go through
the indirection of gimple_ops () computing the offset of the ops array
at runtime. For all cases there is also already index checking in place
in the a
> AFAICT there is something missing in the patch: I do not see any compilation
> of math/logbq.c and indeed no trace of logbq in libquadmath. What I am
> missing?
Maybe you didn’t regenerate the Makefile.in?
The patch was sent without this regenerated file, as is (as I understand) the
custom on
The following fixes comparing of &i and &i if i is volatile. We were
using operand_equal_p to compare i with i which of course results in
a false negative. The following restricts us to the interesting
cases (SSA names and decls) and then simply use ==.
Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu,
Similar to if-combine if-conversion invalidates range info on stmts
that are executed unconditionally only after the transform. Thus
we have to invalidate it.
Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, testing in progress.
Richard.
2015-08-05 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/6712
Dear All,
I had some unexpected regressions, which turned out to be associated
with mulling over FX's problem with intrinsic IEEE modules.
Sendinggcc/fortran/ChangeLog
Sendinggcc/fortran/module.c
Sendinggcc/fortran/trans-decl.c
Sendinggcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
Sendin
On 24 July 2015 at 18:18, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> On 24/07/15 14:20, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
>> On 22 July 2015 at 18:22, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
>>
>>> 2015-07-22 Szabolcs Nagy
>>>
>>> * config/aarch64/aarch64-elf-raw.h (LINK_SPEC): Handle -h, -static,
>>> -shared, -symbolic, -rdy
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 4:37 AM, wrote:
>> > From: Trevor Saunders
>> >
>> > * config/arc/arc.h, config/bfin/bfin.h, config/frv/frv.h,
>> > config/ia64/ia
> The attached patch adds logbq() to libquadmath, with code lifted from glibc.
AFAICT there is something missing in the patch: I do not see any compilation of
math/logbq.c and indeed no trace of logbq in libquadmath. What I am missing?
TIA
Dominique
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/ieee/large_1.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)
> Excess errors:
> large_1.f90:(.text+0x1792): undefined reference to `logbq’
Fixed by the patch there:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-08/msg00124.html
Waiting for review.
FX
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Kumar, Venkataramanan
wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2015 4:07 PM
>> To: Kumar, Venkataramanan
>> Cc: Jeff Law; Jakub Jelinek; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
>>
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> PING: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg01860.html
>
> Actually, the xfailed test was because the function folded to nothing
> and the offending code was removed without warning. Fixed in the
> attached version. Same changelog.
Ok.
Th
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 05/08/15 11:30, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, 5 Aug 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
> >
> > > On 05/08/15 09:29, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > > This patch fixes that by making sure we reset the def stmt to NULL.
> > > > > This
> > > > > means
> > > > >
Canonicalize
> >> > bool compares on RHS.
> >> > * match.pd: Add X ==/!= !X is false/true pattern.
> >>
> >> ERROR in VTST/VTSTQ
> >> (/opt/gcc/gcc-20150805/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vtst.c
> >> line 97 in buffe
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 4:37 AM, wrote:
> > From: Trevor Saunders
> >
> > * config/arc/arc.h, config/bfin/bfin.h, config/frv/frv.h,
> > config/ia64/ia64-protos.h, config/ia64/ia64.c, config/ia64/ia64.h,
> >
On 05/08/15 11:30, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 05/08/15 09:29, Richard Biener wrote:
This patch fixes that by making sure we reset the def stmt to NULL. This
means
we can simplify release_dangling_ssa_names to just test for NULL def
stmts.
Not sure if I
Hi!
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 11:18:32 +0100, David Sherwood
wrote:
> If this looks like my fault
Well, not necessarily your fault -- might as well just be something that
has already been lurking in gcc/lto-streamer-in.c:lto_input_mode_table,
but so far we've gotten away without tripping over it.
> I
atch.pd: Add X ==/!= !X is false/true pattern.
>>
>> ERROR in VTST/VTSTQ
>> (/opt/gcc/gcc-20150805/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vtst.c
>> line 97 in buffer 'expected_signed') at type uint8x8 index 1: got 0x1 !=
>> 0xff (signed input
Hi Thomas,
If this looks like my fault I am happy to look into this and fix the bug
if you can tell me how to reproduce it. I recently changed GET_MODE_INNER (m)
to return 'm' itself if there is no inner mode and I thought I'd fixed up lto,
but it seems I got it wrong. It also sounds like there is
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
>
> > * gimple-fold.c (gimple_fold_stmt_to_constant_1): Canonicalize
> > bool compares on RHS.
> > * match.pd: Add X ==/!= !X is false/true pattern.
>
> ERROR in VTST/VTSTQ
> (/o
On 05/08/15 10:03, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Kyrill Tkachov writes:
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/target_attr_1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/target_attr_1.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..72d0838
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/target_attr_1.c
@@
Richard Biener writes:
> * gimple-fold.c (gimple_fold_stmt_to_constant_1): Canonicalize
> bool compares on RHS.
> * match.pd: Add X ==/!= !X is false/true pattern.
ERROR in VTST/VTSTQ
(/opt/gcc/gcc-20150805/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vtst.c
The inliner decides sth stupid here (IMHO - inlining a function into
a thunk) but at least we shouldn't crash (the tailcall in the thunk
has no BLOCK associated with it).
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2015-08-05 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimiz
Hi Richard,
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2015 2:21 PM
> To: Kumar, Venkataramanan
> Cc: Jeff Law; Jakub Jelinek; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC] [Patch]: Try and vectorize with shift for mult expr
Hi!
It seems as if David's »[PATCH][1/N] Change GET_MODE_INNER to always
return a non-void mode« is relevant here:
On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 16:06:23 +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 14:35:11 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 20:13:02 +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
>
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 05/08/15 09:29, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > This patch fixes that by making sure we reset the def stmt to NULL. This
> > > means
> > > >we can simplify release_dangling_ssa_names to just test for NULL def
> > > stmts.
> > Not sure if I understand the pr
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Aug 4, 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>> Though I wonder on whether splitting the patch into a first one with
>> disabling
>> coalescing of parms (their default defs(?)) and a followup implementing the
>> support for that.
>
> We can't
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:12 AM, kugan wrote:
>
>> You indeed need to use CONVERT_EXPR here, maybe you can elaborate
>> on the optimization issues.
>>
>>> 2. for inline asm (a reduced test case that might not make much as a
>>> stand alone test-case, but I ran into similar cases with valid
>>> prog
Kyrill Tkachov writes:
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/target_attr_1.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/target_attr_1.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..72d0838
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/target_attr_1.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> +/* { dg-do as
PASS
kill: not enough arguments
FAIL: net
Makefile:4696: recipe for target 'net/check' failed
make[4]: *** [net/check] Error 1
$ cat net/check-testlog
PASS
kill: not enough arguments
FAIL: net
../../../libgo/testsuite/gotest: line 514: gotest-timeout: No such file or
directory
Andreas.
--
Andr
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Kumar, Venkataramanan
wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2015 4:07 PM
>> To: Kumar, Venkataramanan
>> Cc: Jeff Law; Jakub Jelinek; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
>>
On 05/08/15 09:29, Richard Biener wrote:
This patch fixes that by making sure we reset the def stmt to NULL. This means
>we can simplify release_dangling_ssa_names to just test for NULL def stmts.
Not sure if I understand the problem correctly but why are you not simply
releasing the SSA name wh
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 16:08:27 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>> We had established the use of a boolean flag have_offload in gcc::context
>> to indicate whether during compilation, we've actually seen any code to
>> be offloaded (see cited be
Hi,
Since the I6400 scheduler is committed, W32/W64 pseudo-processors
are not needed anymore and can be removed.
Ok to commit?
Regards,
Robert
gcc/
* config/mips/mips.c (mips_rtx_cost_data): Remove costs for W32 and W64
pseudo-processors.
* config/mips/mips.md (processor
Hi,
Following up
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg01730.html
The patch below enables the load-load/store-store bonding for MIPS32/MIPS64 R6.
Ok to apply?
Regards,
Robert
gcc/
* config/mips/mips.h (ENABLE_LD_ST_PAIRS): Enable load/store pairs for
I6400.
---
gcc/co
Hello,
Is it ok to backport the patch to gcc-5-branch?
--
Thanks, K
> On 04 Aug 15:31, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
>
> commit 1055739cb51648794a01afd85f59efadd14378ed
> Author: Kirill Yukhin
> Date: Mon Aug 3 15:21:06 2015 +0300
>
> Fix vec_concatv2df and vec_dupv2df to block wrongly enabled A
The following fixes invalid group detection in the vectorizer where
the size doesn't fit an unsigned int.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2015-08-05 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/67109
* tree-vect-data-refs.c (vect_analyze_group_a
FAIL: gfortran.dg/ieee/large_1.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
large_1.f90:(.text+0x1792): undefined reference to `logbq'
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something compl
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr66314.c (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20150805/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr66314.c:1:0: warning:
-fsanitize=address and -fsanitize=kernel-address are not supported for this
target
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2015-08-05 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/67107
* match.pd: Guard const_binop result checking against NULL_TREE
result.
* gcc.dg/pr67107.c: New testcase.
Index: gcc/match.pd
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
> [ was: Re: Expand oacc kernels after pass_fre ]
> On 04/06/15 18:02, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > > Please move this out of the class body.
> > >
> >
> > Fixed and committed (ommitting patch as trivial).
> >
> > > > +{
> > > > + unsigned res = execu
> * gcc.dg/Wframe-address.c: New test.
> * gcc.dg/Wno-frame-address.c: New test.
FAIL: g++.dg/Wno-frame-address.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20150805/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/Wframe-address.C:42:30: error:
unsupported argument to 'void* __bui
[ was: Re: Expand oacc kernels after pass_fre ]
On 04/06/15 18:02, Tom de Vries wrote:
Please move this out of the class body.
Fixed and committed (ommitting patch as trivial).
+{
+ unsigned res = execute_expand_omp ();
+
+ /* After running pass_expand_omp_ssa to expand the oac
95 matches
Mail list logo
