On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 08:54:21PM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote: > > this renames the expr4 field of gfc_code to the more descriptive > ext.lock.acquired_lock. > Regression tested on x86_64-unkown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk? >
I don't have a problem with a name change.
> + /* LOCK/UNLOCK statements */
> + struct
> + {
> + gfc_expr *acquired_lock;
> + }
> + lock;
Just curious. Why add a struct with a single member?
I would have thought s/expr4/acquired_lock should suffice.
--
Steve
