> So, I'd like to change all the ada testcases to use normal unix line endings.
>
> testsuite/gnat.dg/taft_type2_pkg.ads
>
> is an example if one such file, any objections?
No objections.
On 04/09/2012 11:17 PM, Adam Conrad wrote:
Like I said, then, you didn't actually read or understand why proposing
multilib paths doesn't work. You realize conceptually, I hope, that
there's no guarantee of uniqueness in lib/lib64/lib32/libsf/libhf once
you cross the base CPU architecture bound
On Apr 9, 2012, at 8:39 PM, Geert Bosch wrote:
> On Apr 9, 2012, at 23:03, Mike Stump wrote:
>> I'd like to remove execute permissions for:
>>
>> gcc/ada/*.adb
>>
>> Ok?
>
> Sure. What about *.ads?
I assume that was a friendly, please feel free to fix *.ads as well.
Fixed:
* a-assert
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 05:17:36AM +, Adam Conrad wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:01:57AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Monday 09 April 2012 19:31:40 Adam Conrad wrote:
> > > I realize that most people can't see past their own use case to understand
> > > why a unique location for lin
So, I'd like to change all the ada testcases to use normal unix line endings.
testsuite/gnat.dg/taft_type2_pkg.ads
is an example if one such file, any objections?
Em 9 de abril de 2012 17:48, Adam Conrad escreveu:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 10:50:50AM +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
>> On 4 April 2012 18:54, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> >
>> > If the agreement is that arm 32-bit softfp really needs to be installable
>> > alongside 32-bit hardfp (and alongside aarch64
* g++.dg/cpp0x/udlit-raw-op.C: Don't use CRLF endings.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp59.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp60.c: Likewise.
Index: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp60.c
===
--- gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp60.c (revision 186
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:01:57AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 09 April 2012 19:31:40 Adam Conrad wrote:
> > I realize that most people can't see past their own use case to understand
> > why a unique location for linkers is helpful, useful, and important for
> > some other people's us
On Tuesday 10 April 2012 00:16:34 Jeff Law wrote:
> On 04/09/2012 05:14 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > tbh, i thought the ldso discussion was more "we've been talking about
> > this for a long time, so let's just go with XXX" and then people moved
> > on to the next topic (which was defining exactly
On 04/09/2012 05:14 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
tbh, i thought the ldso discussion was more "we've been talking about this for
a long time, so let's just go with XXX" and then people moved on to the next
topic (which was defining exactly what "hard float abi" meant wrt compiler
flags). further, i
On Thursday 05 April 2012 12:25:09 Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 11:55:14 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > note: i don't care about /lib/ld-linux-hf.so.3 or /lib/ld-linux.so.4 or
> > /libhf/ld-linux.so.[34]. /lib// is really the only one i
> > don't think doesn't belong.
>
>
On Monday 09 April 2012 19:31:40 Adam Conrad wrote:
> I realize that most people can't see past their own use case to understand
> why a unique location for linkers is helpful, useful, and important for
> some other people's use cases, but you either didn't read or chose to
> ignore why using multi
On Apr 9, 2012, at 23:03, Mike Stump wrote:
> I'd like to remove execute permissions for:
>
> gcc/ada/*.adb
>
> Ok?
Sure. What about *.ads?
-Geert
Remove execute permissions from gcc/testsuite:
* gcc.dg/dll-8.c: Remove execute permissions.
* g++.dg/ext/dllexport5.C: Likewise.
I'd like to remove execute permissions for:
gcc/ada/*.adb
Ok?
Hi,
I checked in this patch, which has been approved in PR.
H.J.
---
Index: config/pa/pa.opt
===
--- config/pa/pa.opt(revision 186256)
+++ config/pa/pa.opt(working copy)
@@ -138,9 +138,3 @@ Generate PA1.1 code
mspace-regs
The current 4.5, 4.6 and 4.7 branches are now seriously broken for all
PA target due to the fix applied for PR middle-end/52640, an optimization
fix. This is because the PA backend defers output of function descriptors
and externals (hpux) using TARGET_ASM_FILE_END. As a result, assemble_external
Hello,
The attached patch adds HImode addressing support.
Tested against rev. 186243 with
sudo make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim
\{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m2a-single/-mb,-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb,
-m4-single/-ml,-m4-single/-mb,-m4a-single/-ml,-m4a-single/-mb}"
and no new failures.
Test ca
On Mar 14, 2012, at 5:59 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> This fixes PR52571, we should not align DECL_COMMON variables as
>> they might be pre-empted by a definition with lower alignment.
I added this to the PR:
Ah, I had another thought. COMDAT and LINKONCE things I don't think can be
realigned
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 07:14:45PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
> again, saying "/lib//" isn't multiarch is bunk. but it sounds
> like you're fine with /libhf/, so there isn't anything left to thrash about
> there.
I appreciate your careful reading of my email and the issues I outlined,
and
On Monday 09 April 2012 16:48:06 Adam Conrad wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 10:50:50AM +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
> > On 4 April 2012 18:54, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > If the agreement is that arm 32-bit softfp really needs to be
> > > installable alongside 32-bit hardfp (and alongside aarch64),
On 04/09/2012 04:01 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
* It uses the default cutoff as max_width, whatever it is (as
controlled by -fmessage-length).
* It uses the pretty-printer. The text cannot (should not) wrap
because we still print only max_width chars at most.
Hmm, I think if pp_line_cutoff
Oleg Endo wrote:
>> On a second thought, it might be better to simplify those cases in
>> the .md file, where low/high subregs are used by using 'gen_highpart'
>> and 'gen_lowpart' for example, instead of checking the endianness over
>> and over again.
>> I'm trying out a couple of things...
>
>
Hi,
this adds generic support for __builtin_bswap16 (only PowerPC has it for now).
It is mapped to the bswap optab in HImode, whose implementation is as follows:
- if a bswaphi2 pattern is present (PowerPC), it is directly used; or else
- if a rotlhi2/rotrhi2 pattern is present (x86), it is di
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Easwaran Raman wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>>> This patch propagates execution count of thee case labels of a
>>> switch-case statement after its expansion. Bootstraps and all
>>> tests pass. OK for trunk?
>>
>> Hi,
>> while this
On 9 April 2012 20:25, François Dumont wrote:
>
> I don't think I have the necessary rights to close the PR on bugzilla, I
> haven't been able to do so.
You should be able to using your @gcc.gnu.org account. What if you
assign it to yourself first?
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 10:50:50AM +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
> On 4 April 2012 18:54, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >
> > If the agreement is that arm 32-bit softfp really needs to be installable
> > alongside 32-bit hardfp (and alongside aarch64), then IMHO it should do it
> > like all other multilib p
Hi, thanks for the reply.
On 4/8/12 6:25 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
Character pairs like this don't seem very extensible, in that you are
providing meanings for any even-length string, rather than (for example)
only a limited subset of strings leaving room for meanings to be assigned
later to ot
.
(pp_base_get_prefix): New.
* common.opt (fdiagnostics-show-caret): New option.
* doc/invoke.texi (fdiagnostics-show-caret): Document it.
testsuite/
* lib/prune.exp: Add -fno-diagnostics-show-caret.
caret-diagnostics-20120409.diff
Description: Binary data
Attached patch applied to 4_7-branch.
2012-04-09 François Dumont
PR libstdc++/52476
* include/bits/hashtable.h (_Hashtable<>::_M_rehash_aux): Add.
(_Hashtable<>::_M_rehash): Use the latter.
* testsuite/23_containers/unordered_multimap/insert/52476.cc: New.
Hi,
this patch fixes several different ICEs related to handling aliases in WHOPR
partitioning. It took me over week debug this, but when variable alias
is added to a boundary and its destination is not added, we get queue of
unforutnate events where the destinatoin gets analyzed and added at ltran
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Release managers,
>
> On Sun, 11 Sep 2011, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>> I'd like to make the change below which helps with lower resolution
>> systems (or non-maximized web browsers) or larger font sizes.
>>
>> Practically I think everyone would
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
wrote:
> On 9 April 2012 12:43, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
>> wrote:
>>> * c-common.h (c_common_initialize_diagnostics): Likewise.
>>
>> Make the comment less personal; we don't who "I"
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 6:17 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have made a new patch to only have two builtins :
>>
>> * __builtin_cpu_is ("")
>> * __builtin_cpu_supports ("")
>>
>> apart from the cpu init builtin, __builtin_cpu_init.
>
> I d
Hi all,
here is a simple patch for a problem recently reported by Andrew
Benson: Procedure pointers inside a module don't receive the proper
name mangling, which can lead to name collisions (as the test case
demonstrates).
The patch fixes this and regtests cleanly on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
I a
> Isn't the gimple cfg-cleanup we run post optimization (right before
> expansion) not enough? Or the cfg-cleanup we perform right after expansion
> now? At least if the branches are really caused by the gimplification
> process I would expect things to be cleaned up at this point, no?
At least t
On Fri, 6 Apr 2012, Doug Evans wrote:
> btw, is there any interest in mirroring gcc/contrib -> src/contrib?
> [instead of gdb having its own copy in gdb/testsuite, it *could* use
> the one in, e.g., src/contrib. I don't have a strong opinion. I'm
> just looking for others opinions, as the topic ca
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Tom Tromey wrote:
>> "Doug" == Doug Evans writes:
>
> Doug> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Mike Stump
> wroteDoug> btw, is there any interest in mirroring gcc/contrib -> src/contrib?
> Doug> [instead of gdb having its own copy in gdb/testsuite, it *could*
> "Doug" == Doug Evans writes:
Doug> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Mike Stump
wroteDoug> btw, is there any interest in mirroring gcc/contrib -> src/contrib?
Doug> [instead of gdb having its own copy in gdb/testsuite, it *could* use
Doug> the one in, e.g., src/contrib. I don't have a str
Applied.
Gerald
Index: index.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/index.html,v
retrieving revision 1.848
diff -u -3 -p -r1.848 index.html
--- index.html 22 Mar 2012 09:58:00 - 1.848
+++ index.html 9 Apr 2012 14:01:29
Release managers,
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> I'd like to make the change below which helps with lower resolution
> systems (or non-maximized web browsers) or larger font sizes.
>
> Practically I think everyone would understand the new version is the
> same as the old, and the of
> Some more context here: this enables DCE to turn removed insns into
> debug temps when they're useful for debug info. It further improves
> debug info quality when installed along with the patch I just posted for
> PR 48866. Without it, a number of chains of debug temps that lead to a
> real in
On 9 April 2012 12:43, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
> wrote:
>> * c-common.h (c_common_initialize_diagnostics): Likewise.
>
> Make the comment less personal; we don't who "I" is in "I'm putting them here"
> in three months (nor should we hav
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> with the numerous checks generated in Ada, the gimplification process can
> generated dead branches that aren't easily eliminated at -O0 and can impair
> the debugging experience. We have found that unconditionally cleaning up the
>
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 03:29:05AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> from Alexandre Oliva
>
> PR debug/50826
> * df-problems.c (df_note_bb_compute): Do not take note of
> debug uses for whose REGs we won't emit DEAD or UNUSED notes.
> Index: gcc/df-problems.c
>
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Hello,
>
> PR 52870 is another crash in vectorizer pattern detection that was uncovered
> by Ira's patch to enable patterns for SLP as well.
>
> In this case, the problem is that vect_recog_widen_mult_pattern detects a
> statement as part of
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 02:50:02AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> for gcc/ChangeLog
> from Alexandre Oliva
>
> PR debug/51570
> * var-tracking.c (expand_depth): New type.
> (onepart_aux, expand_loc_callback_data): Change depth type to it.
> (loc_exp_dep_alloc): Adjust
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Richard Guenther writes:
>>> They can affect shared memory in some ways like a call, but don't have many
>>> of the other attributes of call. They are really more like an assignment or
>>> other operation with arbitrary shared memory si
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
wrote:
> This patch cleans up the diagnostic initialization of the C-family
> FEs. It keeps the default of no line-wrapping. It moves together all
> initializations and deletes code that has no effect.
>
> Bootstrapped and regression tested on x8
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Richard Guenther writes:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Mike Stump wrote:
>>> On Apr 4, 2012, at 7:56 PM, William J. Schmidt wrote:
There seems to be tacit agreement that the vector tests should use
-fno-common on all tar
This patch cleans up the diagnostic initialization of the C-family
FEs. It keeps the default of no line-wrapping. It moves together all
initializations and deletes code that has no effect.
Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86-unknown-linux-gnu with
enable-languages=all,ada,obj-c++.
OK?
201
Hello!
As pointed out by Eric, there is this little detail in the
documentation w.r.t sign and zero-extending conversions:
"For all conversion operations, X must not be `VOIDmode' because the
mode in which to do the conversion would not be known. The conversion
must either be done at compile-tim
Hi,
with the numerous checks generated in Ada, the gimplification process can
generated dead branches that aren't easily eliminated at -O0 and can impair
the debugging experience. We have found that unconditionally cleaning up the
CFG before emitting the prologue/epilogue can help in some case
Hi,
in Ada record (structure) types can have a variable size and, in this case, the
debug info contains -1 as size attribute for the type. While the long term
plan is to support general expressions as size attribute, a small step forward
is to accept simple variables, which is an important sub
This both eliminates bogus failures in the testsuite on SPARC64/Linux when you
configure --with-cpu=v8 and enables more tests on SPARC/Solaris (which is by
default configured --with-cpu=v9).
Tested on SPARC64/Linux and SPARC/Solaris, applied on mainline and 4.7 branch.
2012-04-09 Eric Botcazo
This is the LTO issue with -fpic/-fpie on SPARC/Linux. When the special GOT
helper function is generated, the compiler invokes:
make_decl_one_only (decl, DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME (decl));
on it, which sets the TREE_PUBLIC flag as expected. The problem is that, in
LTO mode, DECL_ASSEMBLER
56 matches
Mail list logo
