[Bug target/118880] bug 81268, which was supposedly fixed with gcc v8 is still present

2025-02-16 Thread ulinl--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118880 --- Comment #2 from Uwe Lohmann --- Created attachment 60511 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60511&action=edit example

[Bug target/118880] bug 81268, which was supposedly fixed with gcc v8 is still present

2025-02-16 Thread ulinl--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118880 --- Comment #3 from Uwe Lohmann --- Example attached. Compilation with: avr-gcc -Os -fwhole-program -mrelax -Wall -Wextra -mmcu=attiny861 -DF_CPU=100 main.c -o main.elf Interestingly, if the variable 'overflowState' in the attached exampl

[Bug target/118880] New: bug 81268, which was supposedly fixed with gcc v8 is still present

2025-02-14 Thread ulinl--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118880 Bug ID: 118880 Summary: bug 81268, which was supposedly fixed with gcc v8 is still present Product: gcc Version: 14.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/118925] New: Comparison of the copy of a volatile register variable instead of the (register) variable

2025-02-18 Thread ulinl--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118925 Bug ID: 118925 Summary: Comparison of the copy of a volatile register variable instead of the (register) variable Product: gcc Version: 14.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/119077] gcc option -mint8 leads to undefined reference to `__builtin_avr_delay_cycles'

2025-03-08 Thread ulinl--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119077 --- Comment #5 from Uwe Lohmann --- The code compilation with the option -mint8 is different. Compilation without -mint8 (avr-gcc -Os -fwhole-program -mrelax -Wall -Wextra --save-temps -mmcu=avr25 -DF_CPU=100 main.c -o main.elf) cutout of

[Bug target/119077] gcc option -mint8 leads to undefined reference to `__builtin_avr_delay_cycles'

2025-03-08 Thread ulinl--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119077 --- Comment #3 from Uwe Lohmann --- Created attachment 60683 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60683&action=edit main.elf-main.s_without_-mint8

[Bug target/119077] gcc option -mint8 leads to undefined reference to `__builtin_avr_delay_cycles'

2025-03-08 Thread ulinl--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119077 --- Comment #4 from Uwe Lohmann --- Created attachment 60684 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60684&action=edit main.elf-main.s_with_-mint8

[Bug target/119077] gcc option -mint8 leads to undefined reference to `__builtin_avr_delay_cycles'

2025-03-09 Thread ulinl--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119077 Uwe Lohmann changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|WAITING

[Bug target/119077] New: gcc option -mint8 leads to undefined reference to `__builtin_avr_delay_cycles'

2025-03-01 Thread ulinl--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119077 Bug ID: 119077 Summary: gcc option -mint8 leads to undefined reference to `__builtin_avr_delay_cycles' Product: gcc Version: 14.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit