||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Schwinge ---
This liboffloadmic code is gone after commit
r13-3652-ge4cba49413ca429dc82f6aa2e88129ecb3fdd943 "Remove support for Intel
MIC offloading", but I'm leaving this PR open, as it's not specifically
at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Code removed in commit r13-3652
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89863
Bug 89863 depends on bug 71324, which changed state.
Bug 71324 Summary: liboffloadmic/runtime/offload_env.cpp:316]: (style)
Redundant condition
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71324
What|Removed |A
||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org,
||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Similarly -- I guess had to be expeced -- commit
r13-3549-g4fe34cdcc80ac225b80670eabc38ac5e31ce8a5a "c: tree: target
||2022-11-10
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Schwinge ---
I recently started running into such an issue also for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu,
which I determined to be
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: web
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
I notice broken 'onlinedocs' after "Porting t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105914
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://github.com/Rust-GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104749
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 regression] stage1 |[12/13 regression] stage1
,
||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Keywords|diagnostic |
Component|c++ |rust
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
|a/show_bug.cgi?id=106072|
--- Comment #9 from
||/gccrs/pull/1619
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Blocks|95507 |
Summary|[13 Regression] Bogus |[13 Regression] -Wnonnull
|-Wnonnull warning
Priority: P3
Component: libgomp
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
vries at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
With commit r13-4593
-solaris2.11 |
Host|i386-pc-solaris2.11 |
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
gnu.org
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
See Also||https://github.com/Rust
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107633
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://github.com/Rust-GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107633
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Version|13.0
u.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org,
liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108106
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Comment on attachment 54104
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54104
A patch
I'm confirming the checking to work for the case reported;
'build-gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libsanitizer/config
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108098
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-12-16
--- Comment #2 from Thomas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108106
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Comment on attachment 54106
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54106
An updated patch
Yes, that does resolve the the libsanitizer/HWASan build failure.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108106
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Comment on attachment 54114
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54114
Add __interceptor_sigsetjmp_internal
Voilà:
$ size
build-gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libsanitizer/hwasan/.libs/libhw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108113
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108113
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105001
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99555
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Regarding my previous report that after
commit r12-7332-g5ed77fb3ed1ee0289a0ec9499ef52b99b39421f1
"[libgomp, nvptx] Fix hang in gomp_team_barrier_wait_end"...
(In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100181
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
|a/show_bug.cgi?id
||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
,
||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(Beware: I'm still learning GCC's multilib magic, but) has this, by chance,
been fixed by Kito's r11-5530-g3a5d8ed231a0329822b7c032ba0834991732d2a0 "Fix
print_multil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105913
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigne
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openmp
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, rsandifo at gcc d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105975
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Created attachment 53140
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53140&action=edit
'a-for-11.o.xz'
With commit 1d205dbac1e1754c01c22a31bd1688126545401e "Factor out common
internal-fn idiom" s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105975
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Created attachment 53141
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53141&action=edit
'a.xnvptx-none.mkoffload.s.xz'
For cross-checking: if I now temporarily 'git revert
1d205dbac1e1754c01c22a31
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105975
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #4)
> Thanks for the reproducer.
Glad that this approach did work.
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #6)
> Should be fixed now.
ACK, thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105913
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105913
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(In reply to Marc Poulhiès from comment #3)
> Fixed in github, but not yet in gcc's repository AFAIK.
It is, as of today, 10:33 UTC, when I did the 'git push'. ;-).
(If there's more to do, then please
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105913
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67300
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|81886 |
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Schwinge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65181
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Schwinge ---
While reviewing other things, I found that "'alloca' is a preview feature in
PTX ISA version 7.3", and "requires 'sm_52' or higher". That got published
2021-05, so it'll be a while until we can reliably us
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87912
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99137
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Schwinge ---
*** Bug 87912 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87911
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
Last recon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96080
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://github.com/OpenACC/
|WAITING
See Also||https://github.com/OpenACC/
||openacc-spec/issues/25
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94096
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98321
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
There are differences in diagnostics etc. depending on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101551
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Similarly, when calling 'lang_hooks.decl_printable_name (current_function_decl,
2)' in 'gcc/omp-offload.c:execute_oacc_device_lower' for:
#pragma acc routine
template T
ROUTINE(int val)
{
: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
This is strange. In one build of GCC of native x86_64-pc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101574
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Created attachment 51194
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51194&action=edit
Valgrind log
For both the non-working (offloading-disabled) and working (offloading-enabled)
builds I'm usin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101574
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #3)
> You want to configure with --enable-valgrind-annotations (the
> sparseset one is a false positive)
Aha, thanks. Unfortunately: with that added, the probl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101544
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93030
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-27
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101574
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
NCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 51287
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/atta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70392
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Resol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 70392, which changed state.
Bug 70392 Summary: [openacc] inconsistent line numbers in uninitialised
warnings for if clause
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70392
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101862
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Thanks for your comments!
(In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #1)
> I'm not sure exactly what you want to do.
Neither am I! ;-) (Well, I do know "what", but not yet "how".)
> The EVRP pass recogn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95901
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-8-18
--- Comment #1 from Thomas S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95901
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge ---
For the record, the recent commit 1bf976a5de69ecd9b1e10eb7515357b98e78faf7
"openmp: Actually ignore pragma_stmt pragmas for which c_parser_pragma returns
false" gets us rid of the following C vs. C++ differ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101959
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101959
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(In reply to seurer from comment #0)
> cc1: note: self-tests are not enabled in this build
There original (re-enabled) test case was
ty: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Given:
int __seg_fs f;
int __seg_gs g;
..., we ICE when compiling with '-g':
[...]/pr.c:3:1: interna
|1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Confirmed, and see also PR69549 "Named Address Spaces does not compile in C++"
where simila
|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Planning to look into this as part of my ongoing GPU C++ support task.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113331
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2024-02-20 00:00:00 |2024-3-6
CC|
: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: testsuite-fail
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: ams at gcc dot gnu.org, rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
||/gccrs/issues/2890
CC||cohenarthur at gcc dot gnu.org,
||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge ---
If I understood Arthur correctly, GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112653
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111966
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |burnus at gcc dot
gnu.org
omp/gcc-13)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openmp
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: burnus at gcc dot gnu.or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110750
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge ---
... but it *does not* FAIL in my powerpc64le testing with Nvidia Tesla V100
(but *does* FAIL with powerpc64le Nvidia Quadro GV100 in the same way as it
does for x86_64 originally reported here).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88420
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Priority: P3
Component: libgomp
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Re commit r14-2462-g450b05ce54d3f08c583c3b5341233ce0df99725b "li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106271
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100059
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Assignee|burnus at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Schwinge ---
commit r14-3650-gfe0f9e09413047484441468b05288412760d8a09 "Add
'libgomp.c-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109951
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116132
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105361
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116104
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Thanks, Jeff! I'm confirming: GCC/GCN target libraries are again bit-wise
identical to before, and likewise test suite results back to normal.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116103
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116000
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Assignee|unassigne
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
at gcc dot gnu.org |amylaar at gcc dot
gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Keywords||testsuite-fail
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Schwinge
ty: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: ams at gcc dot gnu.org, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
With recent commi
|1
Last reconfirmed||2024-09-02
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,
||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116535
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104957
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Schwinge ---
This was implemented via PR104957 "[nvptx] Use .alias directive (available
starting ptx isa version 6.3)".
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 104957 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104957
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
gnu.org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104957
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Schwinge ---
*** Bug 97106 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97106
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed||2024-09-08
|testsuite
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot
gnu.org
Keywords||patch, testsuite-fail
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge ---
<https://inbox.sourceware.org/87h6apqq4f@euler.schwinge.ddns.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116635
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Summary|new test
|1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
||a/show_bug.cgi?id=116571
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116661
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96265
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Schwinge ---
commit r15-3034-gdb2e9a2a46f64b037494e8300c46f2d90a9fa55c
Author: Prathamesh Kulkarni
Date: Tue Aug 20 12:54:02 2024 +0530
[optc-save-gen.awk] Fix streaming of command line options for offloading.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96265
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Schwinge ---
commit r15-3093-g792adb8d222d0d1d16b182871e105f47823b8e72
Author: Prathamesh Kulkarni
Date: Thu Aug 22 19:25:20 2024 +0530
Recompute TYPE_MODE and DECL_MODE for aggregate type for acclerator.
801 - 900 of 1213 matches
Mail list logo
