||2020-01-05
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Confirmed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67202
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host|67202 |
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65428
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Jan 9 20:57:33 2020
New Revision: 280063
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=280063&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Save typespec for empty array constructor.
2020-01-09 Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 65428, which changed state.
Bug 65428 Summary: ICE on nest array constructor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65428
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65428
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44960
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92836
--- Comment #16 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #15)
> Did we conclude that this is an expected race condition?
>
> I run the example comment 14 and it just hangs for me.
It's certainly not mandated to work, but I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92805
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Hi Steve,
> Index: gcc/fortran/primary.c
> ===
> --- gcc/fortran/primary.c (revision 279052)
> +++ gcc/fortran/primary.c (working copy)
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
I'm a bit confused about this PR.
Is there anything to fix?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91640
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10 Regression] ICE: |[9 Regression] ICE:
|g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92805
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #6)
> No. I do not do git and have little time/need/interest
> in learning.
In that case, I hope you don't mind if I take this up.
I'm just learning git myself (having semi
||2020-01-20
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org,
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Confirmed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93498
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #3)
> Patch is against svn r280157.
>
> Index: gcc/fortran/check.c
> ===
> --- gcc/fortran/check.c (revis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93599
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93599
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Update: I am not convinced that the error message by helgrind is correct.
I have been able to reproduce the error in the meantime, by running
the test case with
#! /bin/sh
set -e
while true
do
for a in `se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93599
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 47800
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47800&action=edit
Possible fix
Here is something that Nicolas and I came up with. The theory is that
pthread_cond_wait can get a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93599
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Hi Jerry,
this is without Janne's patch (which, as far as I see, concerns
handling I/O when the threads have already started).
Regarding testing: I could not get the original test case to fail
on gcc135, a
||
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 47854
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47854&action=edit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93599
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||2020-02-23
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Let's take this one as git practice.
||2020-02-23
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Let's see.
|--- |FIXED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93889
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56224
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig 2013-02-06
20:55:13 UTC ---
I think the file should go into an include directory.
|unassigned at gcc dot |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56224
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56290
Bug #: 56290
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE building OpenFOAM in in
ipa_make_edge_direct_to_target
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56290
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56224
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig 2013-02-14
22:13:38 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Feb 14 22:13:26 2013
New Revision: 196058
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196058
Log:
2013-02-14 Thomas Koenig
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56224
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199
--- Comment #24 from Thomas Koenig 2013-02-17
11:25:15 UTC ---
> Based on those timings, it is a regression - hence, I marked it as such.
Non-trivial to fix. To implement array I/O, we would have to call
len_trim on every record at the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
--- Comment #44 from Thomas Koenig 2013-02-18
18:44:02 UTC ---
If unformatted sequential ever worked, it was by chance.
Look at this piece of code:
/* Seek to the head and overwrite the bogus length with the real
length. */
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
--- Comment #49 from Thomas Koenig 2013-02-18
21:46:58 UTC ---
Here's a proof of concept patch which lets the
test cases "work" due to buffering.
Index: unix.c
===
--- uni
||ice-on-invalid-code
Last reconfirmed||2013-02-27
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56477
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig 2013-02-27
22:31:08 UTC ---
> where value->symtree->n.sym->ns->parent is NULL.
Should be rvalue->symtree->n.sym->ns->parent (copy&paste error).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56575
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56575
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig 2013-03-10
12:09:27 UTC ---
> I will apply this patch tomorrow, as "obvious" if nobody objects.
The patch is also approved, with a test case.
> An annoying feature is that the error is repeated. I d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56581
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56293
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56581
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56581
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56637
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56637
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig 2013-03-16
23:03:06 UTC ---
> I was posting
> in the hope that I might help someone in finding a compiler bug.
And we do appreciate that very much.
The problem is that without a self-contained examp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56637
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44735
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2010-07-01 06:21:38 |2013-03-17 15:00
Known to f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47065
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56637
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||WONTFIX
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig 2013-03-17
17:08:30 UTC ---
I don't think this will get any work anytime soon.
Closing as WONTFIX.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22041
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2010-12-30 12:00:00 |2013-03-17 12:00
Known to f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56708
Bug #: 56708
Summary: [4.9 Regression] Failure calling random_seed with
optimization
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56708
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55806
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45159
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
||2013-03-29
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41137
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Koenig 2013-03-29
22:19:05 UTC ---
The patch from comment#12 causes memory failure of the
following code:
module zero
implicit none
contains
subroutine foo(a)
real, contiguous :: a(:,:)
a(:,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
Bug #: 56789
Summary: Wrong code with contiguous dummy argument
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56800
Bug #: 56800
Summary: [fortran-dev Regression] move_alloc_13.f90 failure
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: fortran-dev
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||37131
--- Comment #11 from Thom
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56800
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig 2013-04-01
17:05:35 UTC ---
The stride needs to be set from the source; it currently
is taken from y (which is an empty type, hence the 0
for sm).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56818
Bug #: 56818
Summary: [meta-bug] fortran-dev bugs
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: fortran-dev
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
,
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|f951.exe internal compiler |ICE in delete_root
|error. segmentation fault |
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig 2013-04-02
20:41:03 UTC ---
The attachment at
http://gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53298
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||56818
--- Comment #1 from Thoma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56867
Bug #: 56867
Summary: Missing temporary with string array assignment
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56867
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56867
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig 2013-04-07
20:19:53 UTC ---
Oops, here it is:
program main
character(len=4) :: a
character(len=4) :: c(3)
c(1) = 'abcd'
c(2) = '1234'
c(3) = 'wxyz'
c(:)(1:2) = c(2)(2:3)
print '(A)',c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56872
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56872
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56867
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig 2013-04-08
20:23:59 UTC ---
I stumbled across this while looking at PR 30398,
when I wanted to add some dependency checking to
make call memcpy instead of memmove if there was
no dependency.
Look for a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56594
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47674
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
--- C
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig 2013-04-09
11:24:07 UTC ---
Please see the release notes:
"The -Wcompare-reals command-line option has been added. When this is set,
warnings are issued
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56872
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig 2013-04-13
20:56:49 UTC ---
Created attachment 29869
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29869
Updated patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57023
Bug #: 57023
Summary: [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Not packing arrays with
changing variable used for size
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57023
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig 2013-04-21
15:54:00 UTC ---
We also have to watch out for
module mymod
contains
subroutine foo(a,n)
integer, dimension(n,n), intent(inout) :: a
integer :: n
call decrement(n)
call
||2013-04-27
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig 2013-04-27
13:01:26 UTC ---
I have a patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57071
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig 2013-04-27
23:19:13 UTC ---
While special-casing power, it might also make sense
to translate 2**n to ishft(1,n).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig 2013-04-28
09:05:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Modulo is an integer only operation, so I'd say you want
> (k & 1) ? -1.0 : 1.0
> instead, converting (k & 1) into floating point and multiplying and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57071
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig 2013-04-28
13:34:08 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Apr 28 13:32:59 2013
New Revision: 198369
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198369&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-04-28 Thomas Koenig
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig 2013-04-28
22:03:35 UTC ---
Created attachment 29968
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29968
patch that fails
The patch in the attachment fails with the test
case
program main
i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56937
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57071
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig 2013-04-30
21:46:11 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Apr 30 21:45:13 2013
New Revision: 198476
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198476&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-04-30 Thomas Koenig
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig 2013-04-30
21:48:03 UTC ---
Fixed. closing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34004
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57071
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57042
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57042
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig 2013-05-01
19:45:13 UTC ---
Other functions returning characters have a bogus
typespec:
ig25@linux-fd1f:~/Krempel/Dump> cat b.f90
program main
print *,adjustl(" a")
end
ig25@linux-fd1f:~/Krempel/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #29968|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54234
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
||2012-08-17
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54298
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig 2012-08-19
15:05:49 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Aug 19 15:05:41 2012
New Revision: 190516
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190516
Log:
2012-08-19 Thomas König
PR fortran/54298
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54298
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54302
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54301
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |blocker
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koeni
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54465
Bug #: 54465
Summary: Implement -Wextra for Fortran
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: enhanc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54599
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig 2012-09-22
10:32:58 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Sep 22 10:32:51 2012
New Revision: 191640
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191640
Log:
2012-09-22 Thomas König
PR fortran/54599
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54599
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
401 - 500 of 3746 matches
Mail list logo
