http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199
--- Comment #24 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-02-17 11:25:15 UTC --- > Based on those timings, it is a regression - hence, I marked it as such. Non-trivial to fix. To implement array I/O, we would have to call len_trim on every record at the right place, then update it. I am tempted to put something original_recl into gfc_unit and set recl to the length of the current record for internal array I/O in next_record_r. I'll play arond a bit with this idea, but it is probably more 4.9 material.
