--- Comment #6 from swagiaal at redhat dot com 2008-11-28 16:33 ---
> (2) Defining declaration <86> should point by DW_AT_specification to its
> non-defining declaration <37>. (The DWARF citation is here from Dodji.)
>
> (But I do not see these two pro
--- Comment #8 from swagiaal at redhat dot com 2008-12-01 16:12 ---
> DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name should be removed from GCC only after the DW_AT_name
> scoping/qualification will get fully fixed. GDB currently already contains
> the
> DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name reader and there
dot org
ReportedBy: swagiaal at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30886
--- Comment #1 from swagiaal at redhat dot com 2007-02-20 15:48 ---
Created an attachment (id=13075)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13075&action=view)
test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30886
--- Comment #3 from swagiaal at redhat dot com 2007-02-22 15:11 ---
Expected:
The collection quota (500 objects) is met and the program exits with a pass
Actual;
The program hangs before the quota is met. Some times not a single object is
collected.
This happens more frequently
--- Comment #5 from swagiaal at redhat dot com 2007-02-22 15:35 ---
Fare enough, I just thought I would bring my test case to your attention.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30886
ONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: swagiaal at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37890
he correct die.
Please advise.
Thanks
--
Summary: Extranious DW_TAG_variable tag
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: swagiaal at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37982
--- Comment #1 from swagiaal at redhat dot com 2008-10-31 19:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=16602)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16602&action=view)
testcase file 1 of 3
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37982
--- Comment #2 from swagiaal at redhat dot com 2008-10-31 19:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=16603)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16603&action=view)
testcase file 2 of 3
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37982
--- Comment #3 from swagiaal at redhat dot com 2008-10-31 19:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=16604)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16604&action=view)
testcase file 3 of 3
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37982
--- Comment #12 from swagiaal at redhat dot com 2009-03-17 15:17 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> I no longer see any DWARF problem there but Archer C++ still does not work
> with
> g++-4.4. Assuming an Archer bug due to the new DW_TAG_lexical_block block.
>
Yes there ar
--- Comment #5 from swagiaal at redhat dot com 2009-03-19 20:07 ---
Hmm.. compiling the testcase from comment #2
with gcc from http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=94544 still
produces import statements only at the global level:
...
<1><42>: Abbr
System.loadLibrary()
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: swagiaal at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From swagiaal at redhat dot com 2005-09-01 20:40
---
Created an attachment (id=9642)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9642&action=view)
testcase that produces the bug
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23686
15 matches
Mail list logo
