This might be related:
the following code compiled with gcc version 4.3.0 20080428 (Red Hat 4.3.0-8):
namespace A{
int x = 1;
}
int main()
{
namespace B = A;
return 0;
}
producdes the following debuginfo:
...
<1><4f>: Abbrev Number: 5 (DW_TAG_subprogram)
<50> DW_AT_external : 1
<51> DW_AT_name : (indirect string, offset: 0x9): main
<55> DW_AT_decl_file : 1
<56> DW_AT_decl_line : 6
<57> DW_AT_type : <0x6f>
<5b> DW_AT_low_pc : 0x40055c
<63> DW_AT_high_pc : 0x400567
<6b> DW_AT_frame_base : 0x0 (location list)
<1><6f>: Abbrev Number: 6 (DW_TAG_base_type)
<70> DW_AT_byte_size : 4
<71> DW_AT_encoding : 5 (signed)
<72> DW_AT_name : int
<1><76>: Abbrev Number: 4 (DW_TAG_imported_declaration)
<77> DW_AT_name : B
<79> DW_AT_decl_file : 1
<7a> DW_AT_decl_line : 8
<7b> DW_AT_import : <0x2d> [Abbrev Number: 2 (DW_TAG_namespace)]
...
the the above die 0x76 should be a child of 0x4f not sibling. Similar nesting
is expected for lexical scopes of course.
--
Summary: Incorrect nesting for DW_TAG_imported_declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: swagiaal at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37890
