[Bug c++/37615] New: terminate called after throwing and instance of 'XXX' c++ testsuite failures

2008-09-22 Thread sposelenov at emcraft dot com
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: sposelenov at emcraft dot com GCC host triplet: i386-linux GCC target triplet: arm-linux-gnueabi http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37615

[Bug c++/37615] terminate called after throwing and instance of 'XXX' c++ testsuite failures

2008-09-22 Thread sposelenov at emcraft dot com
--- Comment #1 from sposelenov at emcraft dot com 2008-09-22 13:32 --- Created an attachment (id=16378) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16378&action=view) Reduced testcase Build as: arm-linux-gnueabi-g++ -o cond1 cond1.C -- http://gcc.gnu.org/b

[Bug target/37615] terminate called after throwing and instance of 'XXX' c++ testsuite failures

2008-10-01 Thread sposelenov at emcraft dot com
--- Comment #2 from sposelenov at emcraft dot com 2008-10-01 11:28 --- Found the cause of the problem - it's binutils 2.17.50. Using ld version 2.18 or even 2.17.90 creates workable libstdc++.so. Could please someone responsible close this bug with correct "resolution"

[Bug c/34903] New: -Os code size regression

2008-01-21 Thread sposelenov at emcraft dot com
llow. -- Summary: -Os code size regression Product: gcc Version: 4.2.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: sposelenov at

[Bug c/34903] -Os code size regression

2008-01-21 Thread sposelenov at emcraft dot com
--- Comment #1 from sposelenov at emcraft dot com 2008-01-21 15:36 --- Created an attachment (id=14987) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14987&action=view) Preprocessed output, GCC 4.2.2 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34903

[Bug c/34903] -Os code size regression

2008-01-21 Thread sposelenov at emcraft dot com
--- Comment #2 from sposelenov at emcraft dot com 2008-01-21 15:37 --- Created an attachment (id=14988) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14988&action=view) Resulted assembler,GCC 4.2.2 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34903

[Bug c/34903] -Os code size regression

2008-01-21 Thread sposelenov at emcraft dot com
--- Comment #3 from sposelenov at emcraft dot com 2008-01-21 15:41 --- Created an attachment (id=14989) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14989&action=view) preprocessed output, GCC 4.0.0 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34903

[Bug c/34903] -Os code size regression

2008-01-21 Thread sposelenov at emcraft dot com
--- Comment #4 from sposelenov at emcraft dot com 2008-01-21 15:42 --- Created an attachment (id=14990) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14990&action=view) resulted assmbelr, GCC 4.0.0 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34903

[Bug c/34903] -Os code size regression

2008-01-21 Thread sposelenov at emcraft dot com
--- Comment #6 from sposelenov at emcraft dot com 2008-01-21 16:08 --- (In reply to comment #5) > The "regression" is due to a wrong-code bug fix. To reduce the code size, the > prologue and epilogue need to emit lwm/stwm for two ranges of registers, which > does

[Bug target/34903] -Os code size regression

2008-01-22 Thread sposelenov at emcraft dot com
--- Comment #8 from sposelenov at emcraft dot com 2008-01-22 10:55 --- (In reply to comment #7) > First, please stop changing the categorization of this bug. > Sorry. > The patch which changed this behavior is > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-06/msg00276