------- Comment #8 from sposelenov at emcraft dot com 2008-01-22 10:55 ------- (In reply to comment #7) > First, please stop changing the categorization of this bug. > Sorry.
> The patch which changed this behavior is > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-06/msg00276.html > Thanks. > The "regression" is due to a wrong-code bug fix. To reduce the code size, the > prologue and epilogue need to emit lwm/stwm for two ranges of registers, which > does not correspond to a standard PowerPC ABI. > Would you please comment the fact, that the removal of the "-ffixed" options doesn't change the code for 4.2.2? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34903
