--- Comment #12 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-08 17:53 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #11 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-08 17:54 ---
Fixed by http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157287
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-08 17:55 ---
Fixed by http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=157286
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |A
--- Comment #1 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-08 22:49 ---
Hi,
is this fail on i686-linux? On x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu I see no fails in
libgomp/ for graphite.exp .
Sebastian
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43274
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-08 22:59 ---
Hi Jack,
is gcc.dg/graphite/run-id-1.c still failing on x86_64-apple-darwin10 or has it
been fixed since then?
Thanks,
Sebastian
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41334
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-08 23:09 ---
Ok, then let's close this PR.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-08 23:10 ---
Ok, then let's close this PR.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-08 23:10 ---
Sorry, I didn't meant this.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #15 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-08 23:16 ---
Yes.
I think it is important to understand what is miscompiled with the graphite
identity.
I will try to reduce this.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42181
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-09 00:49 ---
Ok, so then this is not related to Graphite.
I'm removing the Graphite flag from the subject.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #1 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-09 16:48 ---
Mine.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-09 19:39 ---
Subject: Bug 43306
Author: spop
Date: Tue Mar 9 19:39:27 2010
New Revision: 157322
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157322
Log:
Fix PR43306: correct evolution_function_right_is_int
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-09 21:07 ---
This is different than PR42181.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43306
--- Comment #23 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-09 22:31 ---
Thanks for reducing this testcase.
On the further reduced kernel:
SUBROUTINE SPECTOP(Dr,N)
IMPLICIT REAL*8(A-H,o-Z)
DIMENSION d1(0:32,0:32) , Dr(0:32,0:32) , x(0:32)
REAL*8 Dr
DO k = 1
--- Comment #1 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-11 13:56 ---
Fixed as shown by the automatic tester results today:
http://groups.google.com/group/gcc-graphite-test/browse_thread/thread/cd55ed193db3862a#
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #1 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-12 22:57 ---
It looks like 10 is still a too high number for
PARAM_GRAPHITE_MAX_NB_SCOP_PARAMS
Could you try with --param graphite-max-nb-scop-params=5
I think we should improve the parameter detection to improve the compile time
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-12 23:01 ---
The exponential behavior of PPL has been discussed here:
http://groups.google.com/group/gcc-graphite/browse_thread/thread/db215cefd9bb9c8d
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43349
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-13 17:13 ---
Reduced to:
SUBROUTINE POFUN2(DIM,GRDENT,FPART,FPARTL)
DOUBLE PRECISION GRDENT(*)
DOUBLE COMPLEX FPART(*)
DOUBLE COMPLEX FPARTL(*)
INTEGER REFLCT
IF (DIM.GT.1) THEN
ABCS3
--- Comment #6 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-13 17:27 ---
Subject: Bug 43349
Author: spop
Date: Sat Mar 13 17:27:09 2010
New Revision: 157428
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157428
Log:
Add testcase from PR43349.
2010-03-11 Sebas
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-13 17:27 ---
Subject: Bug 43354
Author: spop
Date: Sat Mar 13 17:27:15 2010
New Revision: 157429
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157429
Log:
Fix PR43354: Correctly handle default definitions.
20
--- Comment #6 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-13 17:35 ---
Subject: Bug 43306
Author: spop
Date: Sat Mar 13 17:34:59 2010
New Revision: 157434
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157434
Log:
Fix PR43306: correct evolution_function_right_is_int
--- Comment #7 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-13 17:35 ---
Subject: Bug 43349
Author: spop
Date: Sat Mar 13 17:35:37 2010
New Revision: 157439
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157439
Log:
Add testcase from PR43349.
2010-03-11 Sebas
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-13 17:35 ---
Subject: Bug 43354
Author: spop
Date: Sat Mar 13 17:35:45 2010
New Revision: 157440
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157440
Log:
Fix PR43354: Correctly handle default definitions.
20
--- Comment #6 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-13 17:36 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #8 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-13 17:36 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-13 17:43 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-13 17:49 ---
Subject: Bug 43351
Author: spop
Date: Sat Mar 13 17:49:24 2010
New Revision: 157442
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157442
Log:
Add testcase for PR43351.
2010-03-13 Sebastian Pop
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-16 21:23 ---
You may want to lower the --param graphite-max-nb-scop-params=5
the current value is at 10. Does this help?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43396
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-16 21:38 ---
I think it is not due to the number of parameters: as 3 is pretty low.
It might be the code that we generate for all the cases.
I will give it a look.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-17 15:13 ---
This looks like a duplicate of PR42860.
This works on gcc4.5.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 42860 ***
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-17 15:13 ---
*** Bug 43398 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-17 15:14 ---
See PR43398 for a nicely reduced testcase.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42860
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-18 18:51 ---
Yes,
I think we should improve if-conversion to handle more complex cases.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43423
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-18 18:59 ---
In the output of ./cc1 -O3 -floop-interchange -fdump-tree-graphite-all
-ftree-vectorizer-verbose=7
we have: "Loops at depths 0 and 1 will be interchanged."
so we do the interchange, but then the vectorizer
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-18 19:01 ---
./cc1 -O3 -msse2 -ffast-math -ftree-vectorizer-verbose=2 pr43427.c
-ftree-loop-linear
pr43427.c:6: note: not vectorized: complicated access pattern.
pr43427.c:7: note: LOOP VECTORIZED.
pr43427.c:3: note: vectorized 1
ion
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43430
The diagnostic message is not clear when compiling this code from FFmpeg with
gcc-4.5 -c vsad_intra.c -O3 -ffast-math -ftree-vectorizer-verbose=7 -msse2
[...]
ac3_downmix.c:10: note: cost model: vector iteration cost = 2060 is divisible
by scalar iteration cost = 7 by a factor greater than or equa
Both these loop kernels fail with:
gcc-4.5 -c vector_fmul_window.c -O3 -ffast-math -ftree-vectorizer-verbose=7
-msse2
[...]
vector_fmul_window.c:7: note: not vectorized: complicated access pattern.
They look similar in the fact that they use both an increasing and a decreasing
induction variables
Both these loop kernels from FFmpeg fail with:
gcc-4.5 -c vector_fmul_window.c -O3 -ffast-math -ftree-vectorizer-verbose=7
-msse2
[...]
vector_fmul_window.c:7: note: not vectorized: complicated access pattern.
They look similar in the fact that they use both an increasing and a decreasing
inductio
--- Comment #1 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-18 21:08 ---
Duplicated of PR43432: pressed "commit bug" twice.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 43432 ***
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #1 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-18 21:08 ---
*** Bug 43433 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43432
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43434
This kernel from FFmpeg is not vectorized with:
gcc-4.5 -c sub_hfyu_median_prediction.c -O3 -ffast-math
-ftree-vectorizer-verbose=7 -msse2
[...]
sub_hfyu_median_prediction.c:18: note: not vectorized: unhandled data-ref
Looking with GDB at it, I get:
(gdb) p debug_data_references (datarefs)
(Data
--- Comment #1 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-18 22:04 ---
Also note that a similar problem occurs for hadamard8:
gcc-4.5 -c hadamard8.c -O3 -ffast-math -ftree-vectorizer-verbose=7 -msse2
[...]
hadamard8_diff.c:44: note: not vectorized: unhandled data-ref
hadamard8_diff.c:26
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43464
--- Comment #1 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-21 07:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=20148)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20148&action=view)
pr43464.i
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43464
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-21 07:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=20149)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20149&action=view)
proposed fix
The proposed fix is to recompute the loop closed SSA form after copy
propagation.
--
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-21 07:32 ---
Subject: Bug 43464
Author: spop
Date: Sun Mar 21 07:32:43 2010
New Revision: 157602
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157602
Log:
Fix PR43464: update loop close SSA once copy prop is don
--- Comment #6 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-21 17:01 ---
Further reduced testcase:
typedef struct regnode
{
char flags;
} regnode;
extern const unsigned char A[];
char *foo (regnode *c, char *s, int norun)
{
int uskip;
while (s + (uskip = A[*s]))
{
if ((c
--- Comment #7 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-21 17:17 ---
The problem is that copyprop does this change:
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
:
# .MEM_16 = PHI <.MEM_18(10), .MEM_20(11)>
# s_66 = PHI
-s_13 = s_66;
+s_13 = s_1;
goto (got_it);
}
--- Comment #10 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-22 00:17 ---
Yes, this patch does fix the problem.
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-copy.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-copy.c
index 57c6558..61e32cc 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-ssa-copy.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-copy.c
@@ -797,7 +797,6 @@ init_copy_prop (void
--- Comment #11 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-22 00:26 ---
I would still like to see some extra checking after copyprop:
would this extra check be ok to commit with the fix?
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-copy.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-copy.c
index 61e32cc..011a80a 100644
--- a/gcc/tree
--- Comment #12 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-22 01:29 ---
Subject: Bug 43464
Author: spop
Date: Mon Mar 22 01:28:51 2010
New Revision: 157617
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157617
Log:
Fix PR43464: loop close phi nodes can contain more
--- Comment #13 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-22 15:47 ---
Note that
* tree-ssa-copy.c (init_copy_prop): Loop closed phi nodes can
contain more than one argument.
breaks both 464.h264ref and 416.gamess with -O3. See for example
http://groups.google.com
--- Comment #27 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-23 20:08 ---
I just verified that the problem is well in CLooG-PPL.
With CLooG-ISL we generate a correct code that looks like this:
for (c2=1;c2<=D.1554_10-3;c2++) {
S1(c2);
for (c4=0;c4<=c2-1;c4++) {
S2
--- Comment #28 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-23 21:24 ---
I fixed this problem in CLooG-PPL: the code generated with
the new version looks like the code generated by CLooG-ISL:
for (c2=1;c2<=D.1554_10-3;c2++) {
S1(c2);
for (c4=0;c4<=c2-1;c4++) {
S2
--- Comment #29 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-23 21:27 ---
Also note that with the fix in CLooG-PPL,
gfortran -O2 -fgraphite-identity air.f90 -o air
./air
passes without error.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42181
--- Comment #30 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-24 20:17 ---
Fixed.
Please use ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/cloog-ppl-0.15.9.tar.gz
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-24 21:11 ---
I don't think this is due to the interchange heuristic,
it looks more like a missed vectorization problem after Graphite.
Closing the bug.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Re
--- Comment #12 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-25 15:15 ---
The patch for the fix is:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=157286
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42130
Java
libs
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-26 20:08 ---
Due to the "FORNOW" fail in vectorizable_condition:
int nunits = TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (vectype);
int ncopies = LOOP_VINFO_VECT_FACTOR (loop_vinfo) / nunits;
if (ncopies > 1)
return fal
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-26 20:13 ---
Reduced testcase, for which ncopies is 4.
typedef unsigned char uint8_t;
vsad16_c (void *c, uint8_t * s1, uint8_t * s2, int stride, int h)
{
int score = 0;
int x, y;
for (x = 0; x < 16; x++)
score += ((s
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-26 20:26 ---
vectorizable_condition has to be cleaned up of this condition:
/* We do not handle two different vector types for the condition
and the values. */
if (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (cond_expr, 0)) != TREE_TYPE
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-26 20:49 ---
This cleanup of vectorizable_condition allows this testcase to be vectorized:
typedef int uint8_t;
vsad16_c (void *c, uint8_t * s1, uint8_t * s2, int stride, int h)
{
int score = 0;
int x, y;
for (x = 0; x <
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-26 21:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=20218)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20218&action=view)
Cleanup comparisons of types
This patch replaces with types_compatible_p all the places in the
vectoriz
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-28 15:56 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> > What does this message mean?
> > "vector iteration cost = 2056 is divisible by scalar iteration cost = 4 by a
> > factor greater than or equal to the vectorization f
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-28 16:28 ---
What about fixing the diagnostic message like this:
diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c b/gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c
index 37ae9b5..44248b3 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-28 16:35 ---
When defining the missing function like this:
static inline int mid_pred(int a, int b, int c)
{
int t= (a-b)&((a-b)>>31);
a-=t;
b+=t;
b-= (b-c)&((b-c)>>31);
b+= (a-b)&((
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-28 16:57 ---
What about fixing this bug with
diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c
index afbd342..2601b58 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c
@@ -2173,9 +2173,9
--- Comment #14 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-30 16:57 ---
Subject: Bug 43464
Author: spop
Date: Tue Mar 30 16:56:49 2010
New Revision: 157828
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157828
Log:
Fix PR43464: copyprop should maintain loop close phi no
--- Comment #6 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-30 19:58 ---
Subject: Bug 43430
Author: spop
Date: Tue Mar 30 19:58:35 2010
New Revision: 157833
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157833
Log:
Replace type != type comparisons with types_compatible_p.
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-31 18:37 ---
Subject: Bug 43351
Author: spop
Date: Wed Mar 31 18:36:45 2010
New Revision: 157882
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157882
Log:
Add testcase for PR43351.
2010-03-13 Sebastian Pop
--- Comment #15 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-31 18:38 ---
Subject: Bug 43464
Author: spop
Date: Wed Mar 31 18:37:41 2010
New Revision: 157889
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157889
Log:
Fix PR43464: copyprop should maintain loop close phi no
--- Comment #16 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-31 18:48 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-01 18:59 ---
I think that this bug should be closed as fixed,
unless we change the subject to:
"At -O3 the loop is not interchanged and thus not vectorized".
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43427
--- Comment #1 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-05 06:59 ---
Subject: Bug 43519
Author: spop
Date: Mon Apr 5 06:58:46 2010
New Revision: 157963
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157963
Log:
Compute min and max bounds for IVs and infer types.
20
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-06 03:16 ---
Subject: Bug 43519
Author: spop
Date: Tue Apr 6 03:15:58 2010
New Revision: 157976
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157976
Log:
Use POINTER_PLUS_EXPR for pointer types.
2010-04-04 S
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-06 03:16 ---
Subject: Bug 43519
Author: spop
Date: Tue Apr 6 03:15:58 2010
New Revision: 157976
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157976
Log:
Use POINTER_PLUS_EXPR for pointer types.
2010-04-04 S
--- Comment #8 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-06 06:14 ---
Subject: Bug 43519
Author: spop
Date: Tue Apr 6 06:14:26 2010
New Revision: 157978
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157978
Log:
Fix 473.astar miscompile.
2010-04-05 Sebastian Pop
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-06 15:45 ---
The fix looks good.
Are you testing this patch, or should I ask Quentin to extra test it on our
end?
Thanks,
Sebastian
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43667
--- Comment #9 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-06 19:20 ---
Subject: Bug 32824
Author: spop
Date: Tue Apr 6 19:19:41 2010
New Revision: 158018
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158018
Log:
Fix PR32824.
2010-04-06 Changpeng Fang
PR mi
--- Comment #9 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-06 21:01 ---
Subject: Bug 43519
Author: spop
Date: Tue Apr 6 21:01:16 2010
New Revision: 158026
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158026
Log:
Compute min and max bounds for IVs and infer types.
20
--- Comment #10 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-06 21:02 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #11 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-06 21:03 ---
Subject: Bug 43519
Author: spop
Date: Tue Apr 6 21:02:25 2010
New Revision: 158027
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158027
Log:
Use POINTER_PLUS_EXPR for pointer types.
2010-04-04 S
--- Comment #12 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-06 21:03 ---
Subject: Bug 43519
Author: spop
Date: Tue Apr 6 21:03:37 2010
New Revision: 158028
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158028
Log:
Fix 473.astar miscompile.
2010-04-05 Sebas
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-08 17:40 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #6 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-08 17:47 ---
I changed the title of this bug to match the comments in the PR:
we should vectorize this loop using if-conversion, and not "iteration
range splitting".
Also note that in general, by doing an "
--- Comment #10 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-11 05:45 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
strap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43737
--- Comment #1 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-13 05:41 ---
This commit causes the bootstrap to fail at -O3.
c26ce8a90a7c8ef9b6587959083d12f6edbc5e01 is first bad commit
commit c26ce8a90a7c8ef9b6587959083d12f6edbc5e01
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Apr 7 12:31:32 2010 +
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-19 21:12 ---
Fixed in the Graphite branch. The changes of the branch will be pushed into
trunk soon.
I will commit the reduced testcase to the Graphite testsuite.
Sebastian
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed
--- Comment #8 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-19 22:14 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4/4.5 Regression] -fprefetch-loop-arrays:
ICE: in initialize_matrix_A, at tree-data-ref.c:1887
Hi,
Here is a fix for this one, on top of the graphite branch.
I will commit this fix to the
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-19 22:33 ---
Subject: Bug 42050
Author: spop
Date: Thu Nov 19 22:32:44 2009
New Revision: 154347
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=154347
Log:
Testcase for PR42050.
2009-11-18 Sebastian Pop
--- Comment #9 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-19 22:33 ---
Subject: Bug 40281
Author: spop
Date: Thu Nov 19 22:32:50 2009
New Revision: 154348
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=154348
Log:
Fix PR40281.
2009-11-18 Sebastian Pop
PR mi
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-21 09:04 ---
Yes, this should be fixed now in the Graphite branch, and it will be fixed in
trunk after the merge that I am preparing.
Sebastian
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-21 09:09 ---
My automatic testers are still failing one of the aermod tests,
see for example pb05.sum from:
http://groups.google.com/group/gcc-graphite-test/browse_thread/thread/4afb9c19aa8a10c7
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-25 04:49 ---
Subject: Bug 41118
Author: spop
Date: Wed Nov 25 04:48:51 2009
New Revision: 154549
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=154549
Log:
2009-09-17 Li Feng
PR middle-e
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-25 05:32 ---
Subject: Bug 42050
Author: spop
Date: Wed Nov 25 05:32:03 2009
New Revision: 154640
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=154640
Log:
2009-11-18 Sebastian Pop
PR middle-e
--- Comment #10 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-25 05:36 ---
Subject: Bug 40281
Author: spop
Date: Wed Nov 25 05:35:58 2009
New Revision: 154641
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=154641
Log:
2009-11-18 Sebastian Pop
PR middle-e
401 - 500 of 738 matches
Mail list logo
