------- Comment #28 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-23 21:24 -------
I fixed this problem in CLooG-PPL: the code generated with
the new version looks like the code generated by CLooG-ISL:
for (c2=1;c2<=D.1554_10-3;c2++) {
S1(c2);
for (c4=0;c4<=c2-1;c4++) {
S2(c2,c4);
S3(c2,c4);
S4(c2,c4);
}
S2(c2,c2);
S4(c2,c2);
for (c4=c2+1;c4<=D.1554_10-2;c4++) {
S2(c2,c4);
S3(c2,c4);
S4(c2,c4);
}
S5(c2);
S6(c2);
}
I will bootstrap and test the graphite branch with the modified
version of CLooG-PPL and then if everything looks good,
I will prepare a new version CLooG-PPL-0.15.9 and I will
upload it on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/
Sebastian
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42181