------- Comment #28 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-23 21:24 ------- I fixed this problem in CLooG-PPL: the code generated with the new version looks like the code generated by CLooG-ISL:
for (c2=1;c2<=D.1554_10-3;c2++) { S1(c2); for (c4=0;c4<=c2-1;c4++) { S2(c2,c4); S3(c2,c4); S4(c2,c4); } S2(c2,c2); S4(c2,c2); for (c4=c2+1;c4<=D.1554_10-2;c4++) { S2(c2,c4); S3(c2,c4); S4(c2,c4); } S5(c2); S6(c2); } I will bootstrap and test the graphite branch with the modified version of CLooG-PPL and then if everything looks good, I will prepare a new version CLooG-PPL-0.15.9 and I will upload it on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/ Sebastian -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42181